ICANN/GNSO GNSO Email List Archives

[ga]


<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

RE: [ga] Transfers Implementation

  • To: Thomas Roessler <roessler@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, ga@xxxxxxxx
  • Subject: RE: [ga] Transfers Implementation
  • From: Joanna Lane <jo-uk@xxxxxxx>
  • Date: Mon, 15 Sep 2003 04:35:51 -0400
  • Importance: Normal
  • In-reply-to: <20030911174915.GM8879@voyager.does-not-exist.org>
  • Sender: owner-ga@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx

Thomas,
A comment period of less than7 days is generally regarded as insufficient
time to support the claim that the community has had a reasonable
opportunity to comment on a policy paper. Please advise ICANN Staff that
they must allow for that as a minimum timeframe in future, or they can
expect systematic rejection of all papers that are presented, regardless of
the merits of the policies.

Thanks,

Joanna

> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-ga@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:owner-ga@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx]On Behalf
> Of Thomas Roessler
> Sent: Thursday, September 11, 2003 1:49 PM
> To: ga@xxxxxxxx
> Subject: [ga] Transfers Implementation
>
>
> Things are moving on transfers implementation.  Draft RAA changes
> are available at <http://alac.info/archives/000627.html>; draft
> standard forms are posted at <http://alac.info/archives/000612.html>.
>
> Comments are welcome, but would be most useful when (1) made during
> the next couple of hours, and (2) either posted to alac.info, or to
> the GA list.
>
> Apologies for the tight time line, but some of this is last minute
> stuff.
>
> Regards,
> --
> Thomas Roessler · Personal soap box at <http://log.does-not-exist.org/>.




<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>