<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
Re: [ga] PLEASE COMMENT: Suggested ALAC response to sTLD RFP
- To: ga@xxxxxxxx
- Subject: Re: [ga] PLEASE COMMENT: Suggested ALAC response to sTLD RFP
- From: "Michael Froomkin - U.Miami School of Law" <froomkin@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sun, 31 Aug 2003 23:16:43 -0400 (EDT)
- In-reply-to: <Pine.LNX.4.33.0308300132560.363-100000@flash.ar.com>
- Sender: owner-ga@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Actually, the document is considerably better than one usually gets from
ICANN-affiliated bodies.
Whether or not the authors of this paper are legitimate/properly
selected/wonderful/powermad/whatever, they seem to have produced a pretty
sensible paper.
If I could make one suggestion, it is that it might be worth mentining
that the only reason we don't have an in-hand 'evaluation' of the existing
'experiment' of new gTLDs is that ICANN
-refused to define criteria for 'success' or 'failure' ex ante
- sat on the data, disabling others from trying to report anything
- hasn't done anything that suggests its about to report anything
meaningful
It's not the fault of the new gTLDs, the applicants, or the public -- and
they shouldn't be penalized.
--
Please visit http://www.icannwatch.org
A. Michael Froomkin | Professor of Law | froomkin@xxxxxx
U. Miami School of Law, P.O. Box 248087, Coral Gables, FL 33124 USA
+1 (305) 284-4285 | +1 (305) 284-6506 (fax) | http://www.law.tm
-->It's very hot here.<--
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|