<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
Re: [ga] Verisign under penalty of perjury: without WLS, registrars 'threaten the stability of the Internet'
- To: richardhenderson@xxxxxxxxxxxx
- Subject: Re: [ga] Verisign under penalty of perjury: without WLS, registrars 'threaten the stability of the Internet'
- From: Eric Dierker <eric@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 6 Aug 2003 05:45:20 -0700 (PDT)
- Cc: gkirikos@xxxxxxxxx, ga@xxxxxxxx
- In-reply-to: <000801c35b36$b3805700$0558fc3e@r6yll>
- References: <000801c35b36$b3805700$0558fc3e@r6yll>
- Sender: owner-ga@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
The USofA has a BTA history of backdragging on open and transparent.
We seem to have used a system of blaming the system for failure.
Failure to take responsibility is becoming the normal course.
It is our inner sense of our patience that makes it work.
e
> George Kirikos's questions deserve detailed dialogue, and specific
> responses from ICANN.
>
> Why does ICANN evade so many fair and sincere questions?
>
> Why is there no mechanism for responses to analyses like George's?
>
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|