<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
Re: [ga] Re: ICANN before the US Senate...
- To: bortzmeyer@xxxxxx
- Subject: Re: [ga] Re: ICANN before the US Senate...
- From: Eric Dierker <eric@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 6 Aug 2003 05:26:15 -0700 (PDT)
- Cc: jandl@xxxxxxxxx, ga@xxxxxxxx
- In-reply-to: <20030806112953.GC14845@nic.fr>
- References: <20030806112953.GC14845@nic.fr>
- Sender: owner-ga@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Interesting dialogue.
Yes, someone must recognize needs of the user not just techincal issues.
e
> On Mon, Aug 04, 2003 at 09:39:18PM -0400,
> L. Gallegos <jandl@xxxxxxxxx> wrote
> a message of 63 lines which said:
>
>> ICANN should also get out of the business management (or
>> micromanagement) and stick to technical.
>
> This is absolutely impossible and let me explain why.
>
>> IANA should be separated from ICANN and should have no bearing on the
>> registries or registrars or ccTLDs other than performing the clerical
>> details - a one person job.
>
> If IANA stays with purely technical jobs (adding or removing a
> nameserver for an existing TLD, adding a protocol number for a new TCP
> service, etc), I agree with you.
>
> But how do you handle non-technical decisions? A few different
> examples:
>
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|