ICANN/GNSO GNSO Email List Archives

[ga]


<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

Re: [ga] Re: ICANN before the US Senate...

  • To: bortzmeyer@xxxxxx
  • Subject: Re: [ga] Re: ICANN before the US Senate...
  • From: Eric Dierker <eric@xxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Wed, 6 Aug 2003 05:26:15 -0700 (PDT)
  • Cc: jandl@xxxxxxxxx, ga@xxxxxxxx
  • In-reply-to: <20030806112953.GC14845@nic.fr>
  • References: <20030806112953.GC14845@nic.fr>
  • Sender: owner-ga@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx

Interesting dialogue.
Yes, someone must recognize needs of the user not just techincal issues.
e


> On Mon, Aug 04, 2003 at 09:39:18PM -0400,
>  L. Gallegos <jandl@xxxxxxxxx> wrote 
>  a message of 63 lines which said:
> 
>> ICANN should also get out of the business management (or
>> micromanagement) and stick to technical.
> 
> This is absolutely impossible and let me explain why.
> 
>> IANA should be separated from ICANN and should have no bearing on the
>> registries or registrars or ccTLDs other than performing the clerical
>> details - a one person job.
> 
> If IANA stays with purely technical jobs (adding or removing a
> nameserver for an existing TLD, adding a protocol number for a new TCP
> service, etc), I agree with you.
> 
> But how do you handle non-technical decisions? A few different
> examples:
> 





<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>