<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
Re: [ga] NTIA tells ICANN that new TLDs plan is unacceptable
- To: GNSO GA Mailing List <ga@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: Re: [ga] NTIA tells ICANN that new TLDs plan is unacceptable
- From: Andy Gardner <andy@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 2 Dec 2010 18:54:37 -0600
Summarising the letter:
"EPIC FAIL, ICANN"
On 02/12/2010, at 6:10 PM, George Kirikos wrote:
>
> Hi folks,
>
> Everyone should read the comments from the NTIA made today:
>
> http://forum.icann.org/lists/5gtld-guide/msg00013.html
>
> to see that the new TLDs plan by ICANN is not realistic. The 2008 letter that
> they reference is at:
>
> http://www.ntia.doc.gov/comments/2008/ICANN_081218.pdf
>
> which I of course discussed in my original comments (I've made several
> since).
> You can see all the comments so far at:
>
> http://forum.icann.org/lists/5gtld-guide/index.html
>
> ICANN as an organization should be listening to folks like myself who've made
> thoughtful suggestions, rather than listen to those trying to "game" the
> system.
> NTIA certainly listens to our comments and concerns, and NTIA is ICANN's
> boss.
> Did ICANN really think that the ultimate "call" on this issue was theirs to
> make? LOL
>
> Obviously NTIA has proven they have a superior understanding of what the
> public
> wants, and it will be a short "leap" from that to the natural conclusion that
> it's time to end the IANA contract --- outsourcing the important function to
> ICANN has proven to be a failed experiment, given that ICANN simply serves a
> small cabal of "insiders", rather than the broader public. ICANN has a short
> window to change that outcome. It can start by placing the new TLDs program
> on
> indefinite hold until the proper economic studies are performed, AND once the
> *optimal* strategy (like our Ascended TLDs proposal, or Fixed Tenders, etc.)
> is
> identified that serves consumers.
>
> Sincerely,
>
> George Kirikos
> 416-588-0269
> http://www.leap.com/
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|