Re: [ga] Re: NAF Panelists and Complainants Caught Systematically Copying/Pasting Nonsense Into UDRP Decisions

[Antony Van Couvering <avc@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

For once I am in complete agreement with Mr. Kirikos.    Quite apart from the 
arbitrary and widely differing results resulting from very similar cases, which 
puts all domain name ownership under a shadow of uncertainty, the UDRP 
providers are willy-nilly making up their own rules.  ICANN regulates every 
other part of this industry, but the one arena where a name can taken away from 
one party and given to another is without any oversight whatever.   This needs 
to change. 

Antony


On Jun 16, 2010, at 10:34 AM, George Kirikos wrote:

> 
> Hi folks,
> 
> It turns out there's a new twist to this story:
> 
> http://www.circleid.com/posts/naf_caught_revising_past_udrp_decisions/
> 
> 
> The public deserves answers, not quiet revisions to history. Why is ICANN not 
> bringing UDRP providers under contract, in order to ensure accountability and 
> minimum standards? Why is this important issue not on the agenda for the 
> upcoming Board meeting, and indeed was ignored in the prior meeting?
> 
> Sincerely,
> 
> George Kirikos
> http://www.leap.com/