<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
Re: [ga] Proposed GNSO Working Group Guidelines Published
- To: Hugh Dierker <hdierker2204@xxxxxxxxx>, "ga@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx" <ga@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Glen de Saint Géry <Glen@xxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: Re: [ga] Proposed GNSO Working Group Guidelines Published
- From: "Jeffrey A. Williams" <jwkckid1@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 10 Jun 2010 16:48:01 -0500 (GMT-05:00)
<HEAD>
<STYLE>body{font-family:
Geneva,Arial,Helvetica,sans-serif;font-size:10pt;font-family:arial,sans-serif;background-color:#ffffff;color:black;}p{margin:0px}</STYLE>
<META name=GENERATOR content="MSHTML 8.00.6001.18928"></HEAD>
<BODY id=compText>
<P>Eric and all,</P>
<P> </P>
<P> Good points! My concern is that the seeming desire is to
front-load a predetermined</P>
<P>decision on the WG before it even gets started. That's not in my mind
at least, what</P>
<P>a open and transparent WG should be doing. Just my 2
cents....<BR><BR><BR></P>
<BLOCKQUOTE style="BORDER-LEFT: #0000ff 2px solid; PADDING-LEFT: 5px;
MARGIN-LEFT: 0px">-----Original Message----- <BR>From: Hugh Dierker
<HDIERKER2204@xxxxxxxxx><BR>Sent: Jun 9, 2010 11:59 PM <BR>To:
"ga@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx" <GA@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Glen de Saint Géry
<GLEN@xxxxxxxxx><BR>Cc: Rod Beckstrom <ROD_BECKSTROM@xxxxxxxxx><BR>Subject: Re:
[ga] Proposed GNSO Working Group Guidelines Published <BR><BR>
<TABLE border=0 cellSpacing=0 cellPadding=0>
<TBODY>
<TR>
<TD vAlign=top>
<DIV>I have been on a few TFs and WG going back to 1999. I applaud some
evaluation and improvement. I believe some of the best of breed from ICANN came
from these groups. I do not see a flaw in the "system" and I do think the new
recs' will make them even better.</DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV>Where I see the failure is in presentation to the public and the BoD and
Council. The desire to reach consensus has overshadowed the age old and true
method of publishing minority positions. And then the conclusions of the group
are not afforded appropriate aplomb or given the forum necessary or the tools
to advocate the conclusions. The consensus driven model creates an environment
where consensus builders are then expected to change their stripes and become
crusaders for a working group cause -- has not happened yet and causes
frustration and impotence. This wastes good results and drives away talented
volunteer contributors.<BR><BR>--- On <B>Tue, 6/1/10, Glen <SPAN>de</SPAN>
Saint Géry <I><Glen@xxxxxxxxx></I></B> wrote:<BR></DIV>
<BLOCKQUOTE style="BORDER-LEFT: rgb(16,16,255) 2px solid; PADDING-LEFT: 5px;
MARGIN-LEFT: 5px"><BR>From: Glen de Saint Géry
<Glen@xxxxxxxxx><BR>Subject: [ga] Proposed GNSO Working Group Guidelines
Published<BR>To: "ga@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx" <ga@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx><BR>Date:
Tuesday, June 1, 2010, 2:30 PM<BR><BR>
<DIV class=plainMail><BR><BR><BR>Proposed GNSO Working Group Guidelines
Published<BR><A
href="http://www.icann.org/en/announcements/announcement-3-31may10-en.htm";
target=_blank>http://www.icann.org/en/announcements/announcement-3-31may10-en.htm</A><BR><BR>WG-WT
Publishes its Report<BR><BR>31 May 2010<BR><BR>As part of GNSO Improvements,
which has as its objective to improve the structure and operations of the
Generic Names Supporting Organization (GNSO), a Working Group (WG) Work Team
(WT) was tasked with developing a Working Group Model. The Working Group Model
should become the focal point for GNSO policy development and enhance the
policy development process by making it more inclusive and representative, and
- ultimately - more effective and efficient. To this end, the WG WT has
developed a document, entitled 'GNSO Working Group Guidelines', which brings
together two different elements of the Working Group process; on the one hand
it addresses what should be considered in creating, purposing, funding,
staffing, and instructing/guiding a WG to accomplish the desired outcome (the
chartering process), and; secondly, what guidance should be provided to a WG on
elements such as structuring, norms, tasking, reporting, and delivering the
outcome(s) as chartered (the working group !<BR>process). Following review of
public comments on an earlier version of the proposed GNSO Working Group
Guidelines, the WG WT has now finalized its recommendations and will submit the
proposed GNSO Working Group Guidelines to the Policy Process Steering Committee
(PPSC) for its review.<BR><BR>Background<BR><BR>In the past, the GNSO decided
policy mainly through small legislative bodies called "Task Forces."
Intentionally, it is moving towards a more inclusive, representative model
where key parties tackle an issue together as a "Working Group," then make
recommendations to the GNSO Council. The WG WT was tasked to define the new
Working Group model, including guidelines, checklists, and other materials to
speed the process of creating, chartering, naming, funding, staffing, and
guiding a GNSO Working Group.<BR><BR>Further Information<BR><BR> *
GNSO Working Group Guidelines - <A
href="http://gnso.icann.org/improvements/working-group-guidelines-31may10-en.pdf";
target=_blank>http://gnso.icann.org/improvements/working-group-guidelines-31may10-en.pdf</A>
[PDF, 681 KB]<BR> * WG-WT Workspace - <A
href="https://st.icann.org/icann-ppsc/index.cgi?working_group_team";
target=_blank>https://st.icann.org/icann-ppsc/index.cgi?working_group_team</A><BR>
* GNSO Improvements - <A href="http://gnso.icann.org/en/improvements/";
target=_blank>http://gnso.icann.org/en/improvements/</A><BR><BR>Staff
responsible: Marika Konings<BR><BR>Glen de Saint Géry<BR>GNSO Secretariat<BR><A
href="http://us.mc529.mail.yahoo.com/mc/compose?to=gnso.secretariat@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx";
ymailto="mailto:gnso.secretariat@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx";>gnso.secretariat@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx</A><BR><A
href="http://gnso.icann.org/";
target=_blank>http://gnso.icann.org</A><BR><BR></DIV></BLOCKQUOTE></TD></TR></TBODY></TABLE><BR>Regards,<BR><BR>Jeffrey
A. Williams<BR>Spokesman for INEGroup LLA. - (Over 300+k members/stakeholders
and growing, strong!)<BR>"Obedience of the law is the greatest freedom"
-<BR> Abraham Lincoln<BR><BR>"Credit should go with the performance
of duty and not with what is very<BR>often the accident of glory" - Theodore
Roosevelt<BR><BR>"If the probability be called P; the injury, L; and the
burden, B; liability<BR>depends upon whether B is less than L multiplied
by<BR>P: i.e., whether B is less than PL."<BR>United States v. Carroll
Towing (159 F.2d 169 [2d Cir.
1947]<BR>===============================================================<BR>Updated
1/26/04<BR>CSO/DIR. Internet Network Eng. SR. Eng. Network data security IDNS.
div. of<BR>Information Network Eng. INEG. INC.<BR>ABA member in good
standing member ID 01257402 E-Mail jwkckid1@xxxxxxxxxxxxx<BR>Phone:
214-244-4827</BLOCKQUOTE></BODY>
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|