<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
Re: [ga] Dierker NOT Private
- To: John Palmer <jpalmer@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, ga@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx, info@xxxxxxx
- Subject: Re: [ga] Dierker NOT Private
- From: "Jeffrey A. Williams" <jwkckid1@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sun, 23 May 2010 16:44:06 -0500 (GMT-05:00)
<HEAD>
<STYLE>body{font-family:
Geneva,Arial,Helvetica,sans-serif;font-size:10pt;font-family:arial,sans-serif;background-color:#ffffff;color:black;}p{margin:0px}</STYLE>
<META content="MSHTML 6.00.6000.16825" name=GENERATOR></HEAD>
<BODY id=compText>
<P>John and all,</P>
<P> </P>
<P> Indeed it is troubling that you have 'Issues" whatever they may be as
you are not too</P>
<P>specific or provide any emphrical evidence to same. Hopefully that
will be forthcoming?</P>
<P>In any event Angelfire's reputation as their DNS config clearly shows are in
question</P>
<P>technically speeking at least, see: <A
href="http://www.dnsstuff.com/tools/dnsreport?domain=angelfire.com&format=raw&loadresults=true&token=2541b0e492485e093546230e17377018";>http://www.dnsstuff.com/tools/dnsreport?domain=angelfire.com&format=raw&loadresults=true&token=2541b0e492485e093546230e17377018</A></P>
<P>for further information. Also seems that Angelfire has long been in
trouble with LEA's and</P>
<P>seemingly remains so, see: <A
href="http://www.counterpunch.org/angelfire.html";>http://www.counterpunch.org/angelfire.html</A> for
example. So</P>
<P>perhaps Mr. Palmer you can update your information to something a bit more
accurate</P>
<P>accordingly, and soon. >:) Further I fail too see what your
subject line has to do with</P>
<P>your remarks below as well... Care to elaborate more specifically
please? Thanks</P>
<P>in advance for your cooperation accordingly. >:)<BR><BR><BR></P>
<BLOCKQUOTE style="PADDING-LEFT: 5px; MARGIN-LEFT: 0px; BORDER-LEFT: #0000ff
2px solid">-----Original Message----- <BR>From: John Palmer
<JPALMER@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx><BR>Sent: May 23, 2010 3:58 PM <BR>To:
ga@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx <BR>Subject: [ga] Dierker NOT Private
<BR><BR><ZZZHTML><ZZZHEAD><ZZZMETA content="text/html; charset=iso-8859-1"
http-equiv="Content-Type"><ZZZMETA name="GENERATOR" content="MSHTML
6.00.2900.5921">
<STYLE></STYLE>
</ZZZHEAD><ZZZBODY bgColor="#ffffff">
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2>Hugh:</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2>This isnt a flame war. I have a legitimate concern
that there are agitators on this list</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2>that are not who they say they are and who are
working against the interests of IDNO's. </FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2>The Angelfire website raises legitimate concerns
about someone who has done everything</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2>he can to obfuscate his identity. </FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2>If we do revamp this constituency, it will have no
credibility unless all of the cards are</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2>layed out on the table in a transparent
way.</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2>By the way, this is one of the mantras of your
buddy Baptista - transparency.</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2>So, Hugh - why are you opposed to
transparency? I don't think this is </FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2>small concern.</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2>As I have said before, I have SERIOUS questions
about the identities and motives of</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2>several of the folks here.</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2>John</FONT></DIV>
<BLOCKQUOTE style="PADDING-RIGHT: 0px; PADDING-LEFT: 5px; MARGIN-LEFT: 5px;
BORDER-LEFT: #000000 2px solid; MARGIN-RIGHT: 0px">
<DIV style="FONT: 10pt arial">----- Original Message ----- </DIV>
<DIV style="BACKGROUND: #e4e4e4; FONT: 10pt arial; font-color:
black"><B>From:</B> <A title=hdierker2204@xxxxxxxxx
href="mailto:hdierker2204@xxxxxxxxx";>Hugh Dierker</A> </DIV>
<DIV style="FONT: 10pt arial"><B>To:</B> <A
title=jpalmer@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
href="mailto:jpalmer@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx";>John Palmer</A> </DIV>
<DIV style="FONT: 10pt arial"><B>Sent:</B> Friday, May 21, 2010 8:35 AM</DIV>
<DIV style="FONT: 10pt arial"><B>Subject:</B> Palmer NOT Private</DIV>
<DIV><BR></DIV>
<TABLE cellSpacing=0 cellPadding=0 border=0>
<TBODY>
<TR>
<TD vAlign=top>
<DIV>Mr. Palmer</DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV>Please do not start to derail and obfiscate work being done here with
starting your own personal flaming wars. The identification process spoken of
is for membership in a constituency. It is not for this list. If you were not
so blinded by your obvious hate mongering and narrow personal vendettas you
would see that. You have already made it clear that you are driven my ego and
fear, and not to benefit anyone but yourself. Further attacks will not be
censored or banned but you will make yourself invisible by your childlike
behavior.</DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV>If you continue down this road I will post all your private posts that
show just how obsessed you are. I write this offlist not as private but as to
keep it off list.<BR><BR>--- On <B>Thu, 5/20/10, John Palmer
<I><jpalmer@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx></I></B> wrote:<BR></DIV>
<BLOCKQUOTE style="PADDING-LEFT: 5px; MARGIN-LEFT: 5px; BORDER-LEFT:
rgb(16,16,255) 2px solid"><BR>From: John Palmer
<jpalmer@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx><BR>Subject: Re: [ga] |Going forward
towards a Registrant's Constituency<BR>To: sotiris@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx,
ga@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx<BR>Date: Thursday, May 20, 2010, 12:07 PM<BR><BR>
<DIV class=plainMail><BR>I think that this is a FANTASTIC idea. I have strong
reason to beleive that we have dire need to verify the identity of at least one
person on this list (one who is a frequent poster). <BR>Seeing as how
there is a whole website that PROVES that his<BR>previous addresses were
nothing but empty lots, etc, I think<BR>that requiring proof of identity is
fantastic.<BR><BR>Cheers,<BR>John<BR><BR>----- Original Message ----- From:
<<A
href="http://us.mc529.mail.yahoo.com/mc/compose?to=sotiris@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx";
ymailto="mailto:sotiris@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx";>sotiris@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx</A>><BR>To:
<<A href="http://us.mc529.mail.yahoo.com/mc/compose?to=ga@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx";
ymailto="mailto:ga@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx";>ga@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx</A>><BR>Sent: Thursday,
May 20, 2010 1:45 PM<BR>Subject: [ga] |Going forward towards a Registrant's
Constituency<BR><BR><BR><BR>First, let's thank Joop for offering up the IDNO
charter for us to use as<BR>a basis for an RC charter.<BR><BR>Next, let's get
one piece of fundamental business out ofthe way. When i<BR>voted in the ICANN
2000 AtLarge election, it was only after my identity<BR>had been verified and a
letter had been sent to my physical address with<BR>my acct/password info for
voting day. In order for us to move forward on<BR>creating an RC we need to
VERIFY that the prospective membership is who<BR>they say they are.
Fortunately, there are many options available for us<BR>today. My preference
would be for a digital certificate. Does anyone have<BR>any problem with being
required to provide proof of one's identity in<BR>order to participate in a
Registrant's Constituency? If anyone does have a<BR>problem, the solution is
simple, they can form their own constituency of<BR>non-identities. I am willing
to put the work into an RC but only with<BR>other verified individuals. So,
who's willing to join me in this<BR>endeavour?<BR><BR>Sotiris
Sotiropoulos<BR><BR><BR></DIV></BLOCKQUOTE></TD></TR></TBODY></TABLE><BR>Regards,<BR><BR>Jeffrey
A. Williams<BR>Spokesman for INEGroup LLA. - (Over 294k members/stakeholders
and growing, strong!)<BR>"Obedience of the law is the greatest freedom"
-<BR> Abraham Lincoln<BR><BR>"Credit should go with the performance
of duty and not with what is very<BR>often the accident of glory" - Theodore
Roosevelt<BR><BR>"If the probability be called P; the injury, L; and the
burden, B; liability<BR>depends upon whether B is less than L multiplied
by<BR>P: i.e., whether B is less than PL."<BR>United States v. Carroll
Towing (159 F.2d 169 [2d Cir.
1947]<BR>===============================================================<BR>Updated
1/26/04<BR>CSO/DIR. Internet Network Eng. SR. Eng. Network data security IDNS.
div. of<BR>Information Network Eng. INEG. INC.<BR>ABA member in good
standing member ID 01257402 E-Mail jwkckid1@xxxxxxxxxxxxx<BR>Phone:
214-244-4827</BLOCKQUOTE></ZZZBODY></ZZZHTML></BLOCKQUOTE></BODY>
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|