Re: [ga] European MP says "unbelievable" German high school student getting away with domain scam

[Thomas Baxter <baxtertms@xxxxxxxxx>]

Hi Joe!!! Posting under your fake name of Jeffrey again?

Should I call you Jeff or Joe - which one do you like most hummm???

Thoms

 BAX! Names Allentown
http://www.bax-names-allentown.com
Computer setup, training, software and services
Coming soon: BAX-Mail - free web email under the BAX TLD.




________________________________
From: Jeffrey A. Williams <jwkckid1@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
To: Joe Baptista <baptista@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; "ga@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx >> GA" 
<ga@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Matthew Pemble <matthew@xxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Wed, April 28, 2010 1:24:03 PM
Subject: Re: [ga] European MP says "unbelievable" German high school student 
getting away with domain scam

 
Dr. Joe, Matthew and all,
 
  I know Dr. Baptista and have for a number of years now.  He has never in my 
experience
or knowledge mislead anyone or been a perpatrator of any wrongdoing.  Claims to 
the
contrary by anyone would need to provide me, and any other reasonable person or
legal entity of such accordingly.  What has been so far "Offered" in this 
regard is
so much nonsense as to be discounted greatly if not all together accordingly by 
myself
at least.
 
  Dr. Joe, I think it would be in your and everyone else'es best interest to 
take these 
back and forth arguments off list and done in private accordingly.  I suggest 
the 
same to all those interested other parties as well without reservation 
accordingly.
I would also suggest that any precieved or actual wrongdoing at whatever level
and appropriate evidence be turned over to the proper authorities forthwith
without further delay if any party feels that they are being victimized 
accordingly.
Dr. Joe, in Canada I believe the proper authorities would be the RCMP and 
perhaps
Interpol in this instance.



-----Original Message----- 
>From: Joe Baptista 
>Sent: Apr 28, 2010 12:43 PM 
>To: "ga@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx >> GA" 
>Cc: Matthew Pemble 
>Subject: Re: [ga] European MP says "unbelievable" German high school student 
>getting away with domain scam 
>
>John if Matthew really wants to investigate let me provide him with some 
>references.
>
>All you have to do Matthew is read the investigation conducted by Karl Peters 
>of the TLDA. The same organization that John is a director of. That can be 
>found at the URL: http://bit.ly/9gTXgQ as a gzip file. I think it's 9 megs in 
>size.
>
>Of course I don't expect you to read it Matthew and remind John that it may be 
>inappropriate to appeal to Matthew as judge jury and executioner. I don't 
>think he has time for that ... but ...
>
>
>On Wed, Apr 28, 2010 at 11:47 AM, John Palmer 
><jpalmer@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
>  
>>
>>In case you aren't aware, let me fill you in. Joe Baptista attempted to 
>>extort shares
>>of stock in a company called UNIDT back in 2005 and when they wouldn't give 
>>in to
>>his extortion attempts, he launched a campaign of slander and lies against 
>>the operators
>>of that company. 
>
>Not true. I did make clear to all involved I would go public if what was 
>promised was not delivered. You see Matthew I agreed to support an 
>organization having a membership in which TLD holders would be the members. 
>This organization was designated as INAIC.
>
>My investigation showed the organization was designed to only have one member 
>- Herman Xennt. That is not what was promised - I gave them time to fix the 
>problem and then I shut down the show when they failed to meet my demands by 
>going public. I did my duty on behalf of the TLD holders in the project and 
>demanded they get what was promised - a vote.
>
>And if there is any dispute of these claims I would point you or anyone else 
>who may be interested to a decision of the Amsterdam court published March 
>2006 http://bit.ly/au3qfs in which the judge presiding over the matter known 
>as "Herman Xennt v. Martijn Burger & INAIC" confirms my claims above. The 
>decision is in dutch.
> 
>The German student is a businessperson who is operating a business 
>>that is an affiliate of a company (INAIC - www.inaic.com) that is associated 
>>with UNIDT
>>the victim of this extortion attempt. Joe is using this poor student as a 
>>pawn in his
>>insane vendetta against the operators of INAIC, many of which were involved 
>>in the 
>>company UNIDT that was a victim of Joe. 
>
>No - the student in this is completely irrelevant to the issues at hand. What 
>is relevant is the teenager is selling stolen TLDs and using his school as a 
>backdrop to convince people the scam is real.
>
>As for the teenager being a business person - I have no idea of that. I would 
>say that a prudent business person would of done their due diligence and taken 
>the time to invest INAIC. A prudent business person would quickly come to the 
>conclusion the INAIC smelled bad and would of stayed away from it and not 
>gotten implicated in a fraud.
>
>The real issue for me John is that the schools name is being used to 
>prostitute the Herman Xennt con game. Because people John is absolutely right 
>in asking the question if the student is in fact misrepresenting the school 
>and using the schools name inappropriately then why has nothing happened. Why 
>is the student still using the schools name to market Palmers & Xennts stolen 
>TLD investory.
>
>The school is obligated to act if not only to protect the public but also 
>itself from a scandalous association. Thats the issue I'm pursuing here.
>
>As for the student. I no longer know if he's a budding career criminal or a 
>victim himself of the fraud. In the beginning I gave him the benefit of the 
>doubt. But when I found out he was caught impersonating a school official in 
>email to ARIN and his principle tells him to not use the school name - yet he 
>does - we'll I'm not so sure what to make of him but I don't think at this 
>stage he is innocent.
>
><snip> <snip> <psychodrama> <psychobabble> <deleted>
>
>
>
>>
>>The "story" that Joe has posted on his website regarding the student at 
>>Gymnasium Querfurt
>>is a fabrication entirely of Joe's making. 
>
>OK - next question in the John Palmer accountability series. My article on the 
>school mentions Keith Teare calling you guys at INAIC a scam. Assume I have 
>supporting documentary proof of this - what do you have to say concerning his 
>comments?
>
>
>regards
>joe baptista
>
>p.s. <snip> <snip> <psychodrama> <psychobabble> <deleted>
>
>
>
> 
>Regards,
>
>Jeffrey A. Williams
>Spokesman for INEGroup LLA. - (Over 294k members/stakeholders and growing, 
>strong!)
>"Obedience of the law is the greatest freedom" -
>   Abraham Lincoln
>
>"Credit should go with the performance of duty and not with what is very
>often the accident of glory" - Theodore Roosevelt
>
>"If the probability be called P; the injury, L; and the burden, B; liability
>depends upon whether B is less than L multiplied by
>P: i.e., whether B is less than PL."
>United States v. Carroll Towing  (159 F.2d 169 [2d Cir. 1947]
>===============================================================
>Updated 1/26/04
>CSO/DIR. Internet Network Eng. SR. Eng. Network data security IDNS. div. of
>Information Network Eng.  INEG. INC.
>ABA member in good standing member ID 01257402 E-Mail jwkckid1@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>Phone: 214-244-4827
>