Re: [ga] Re: Resolving .gov w/dnssec

["John Palmer" <jpalmer@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Hugh - I hope you undertsand by now that none of Joe's claims about criminality 
and fraud in 
Europe have been proven true, in fact, evidence is that he was the only one who 
committed any
kind of offense (stealing a bike).

All of Joe's "evidence" is just his own writings on his silly little website 
that he crafts in a way to 
make them look like news articles that he has pinched from somewhere else. The 
casual (read: lazy)
observer visiting his website will be fooled into thinking that they are 
authoritative. They are not.

I have investigated his latest scam - the Gymnasium Querfurt incident and the 
results show that he
pounced on more innocent victims in his mad vendetta against Herman Xennt and 
his group. The
results of my investigation are here:

http://lair.lionpost.net/pipermail/baptista-offenses/2010-April/000021.html

He dragged an innocent high school student into his swirling pit of psychosis 
and annoyed the principal of
a top school in Germany by pretending to be someone of knowledge and authority, 
which  he is most 
certainly IS NOT.

If you want an accurate depiction of what Joe did in Holland in 2005 - the 
damage he caused - see
here for the real story:

http://inaic.com/index.php?p=internet-terror
Now Joe, if you want me to stop following you around to correct your lies, 
misrepresentations, half truths and paranoidravings, you need to be quiet:You 
will NEVER AGAIN call Herman or the people in Europe crooks, refer to their 
businesses and crooked, tell the lie that theyare criminals, tax cheats or 
other vile things WHICH THEY ARE NOT.You will NEVER, EVER again call anyone a 
"welfare bum" or insult members of their family or discuss those members ona 
public list without the person's permission.You will NEVER again claim that you 
in any way have any authority in the TLDA or that you are even a member or 
haveany right to tell the organization how to conduct its business. You will 
NEVER EVER engage in any other slander or other bad behavior in the inclusive 
namespace. You will NEVER EVER EVERagain seek to destroy or disrupt any 
registry, registrar, TLD reseller, root operator or other DNS professional in 
the Inclusive Namespace.You will avoid causing any other trouble to this 
industry or any other industry or cause that is important to me and the 
otherswith which  I associate.If you continue to violate these rules, I will 
follow you around and pummel you into dust each and every time you open your 
filthy, slanderous and psychotic mouth so that the poor listeners can be given 
the truth about you and your destructive lies. This is a page Iam taking out of 
Tom Evan's book. GOT THAT, JOE.Cheers,John----- Original Message ----- From: 
Hugh Dierker 
  To: cet1@xxxxxxxxx ; ga@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx >> GA ; Joe Baptista 
  Cc: Paul Wouters ; Bind Users Mailing List ; Timothe Litt 
  Sent: Thursday, April 22, 2010 11:15 PM
  Subject: Re: [ga] Re: Resolving .gov w/dnssec


        Fair trade is necessary trade. Unnecessary tradeoffs are lame. These 
problems are not necessary -- except that they are within the given framework 
of lack of motivation to do better.  It comes down to this, if we set our 
standards outside of competitive models there is no incentive to do better.  
ICANN, the Dnssec and this SAIC are working within government sanctioned 
slobbery, both intellectual and economic slobbery.  I used to think it was 
snobbery, now I know it is a laziness born of shovel leaning bureaucrats. You 
may be kind and call it "make work" but would you call intentional fraud "make 
work"? Buggy whips and Railroad fireman is what this is.

        The plan I am putting together for the inculsives will generate some 
new fire under the pants of these obstructionists and they will find that a 
better mousetrap can be built.



        --- On Thu, 4/22/10, Joe Baptista <baptista@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:


          From: Joe Baptista <baptista@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
          Subject: [ga] Re: Resolving .gov w/dnssec
          To: cet1@xxxxxxxxx, "ga@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx >> GA" <ga@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
          Cc: "Paul Wouters" <paul@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "Bind Users Mailing List" 
<bind-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "Timothe Litt" <litt@xxxxxxx>
          Date: Thursday, April 22, 2010, 8:07 AM


          Looks like the future of the DNSSEC make work project includes 
resolution failures here and there. More security - less stability - guaranteed 
slavery. I wounder if it's a fair trade.

          we'll see ..
          regards
          joe baptista


          On Thu, Apr 22, 2010 at 10:52 AM, Chris Thompson <cet1@xxxxxxxxx> 
wrote:

            On Apr 22 2010, Paul Wouters wrote:


              On Thu, 22 Apr 2010, Timothe Litt wrote:


                I'm having trouble resolving uspto.gov with bind 9.6.1-P3 and 
9.6-ESV
                configured as valdidating resolvers.

                Using dig, I get a connection timeout error after a long (~10 
sec) delay.
                +cdflag provides an immediate response.



                Is anyone else seeing this?  Ideas on how to troubleshoot?


              I have the same problems with our validating unbound instance. 



            I suspect that this has to do with

             dig +dnssec +norec dnskey uspto.gov @dns1.uspto.gov.
             dig +dnssec +norec dnskey uspto.gov @sns2.uspto.gov.

            failing with timeouts, while   dig +dnssec +norec +vc dnskey 
uspto.gov @dns1.uspto.gov.
             dig +dnssec +norec +vc dnskey uspto.gov @dns2.uspto.gov.

            work fine ... with a 1736-byte answer. Probably the fragmented
            UDP response is getting lost somewhere near the authoritative
            servers themselves.

            -- 
            Chris Thompson
            Email: cet1@xxxxxxxxx 


            _______________________________________________
            bind-users mailing list
            bind-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
            https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users