ICANN/GNSO GNSO Email List Archives

[ga]


<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

Re: OT: another moment with John Palmer All Joe does is destroy - show me his positive aspects in the I.N.S. (was Re: OT - a moment with John Palmer Re: [ga] censorship among root servers)

  • To: POST-TO GNSO LIST <ga@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Subject: Re: OT: another moment with John Palmer All Joe does is destroy - show me his positive aspects in the I.N.S. (was Re: OT - a moment with John Palmer Re: [ga] censorship among root servers)
  • From: Thomas Baxter <baxtertms@xxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Fri, 2 Apr 2010 20:53:45 -0700 (PDT)

Joe joe joe

You didnt answer the question that I just posed in my subj line, namely - what 
positive aspects did you ever
give to the causes of the I.N.S.?

We know you were sued by the police in Canada because you annoyed the local 
govt with your complaints
that police officers shouldn't be able to stop for meals during their hard days 
of protection for the public good.

The guy from the government, I think he said that your a bit of a kook or 
something like that, so
the question should be asked loud:

WHY SHOULD ANY PERSON TRUST ANY INFORMATION YOU SAY, JOE INCLUDING YOUR PARA 
NOID RAVINGS
REGARDING HERMAN XENT?????????????????

The way a lot of persons see the issue re Europe in around 2005 is that you did 
a deliberate sabatage when
it looked like I.N.S. would actually succeed and you know the whole industry 
died off after your stabbed it
around the heart.

Sorry crackpott, but very few people think that this is only by accident. 

I think (and do do many peoples and companies, including some sovern 
goverments) that you did this 
on purpose to kill the chances of competition for icann are the person that 
does not have much credibles. 

I think you are paid from icann. You dont seem to have more visible supports 
and live with street people in 
a po dunk town in Ontaio. You called Karl a welfare bumb once - but what are 
you but even worse because
at least Karl is an honest religion person with a nice family who tries hard. 

You, you are just a sell-off and trator. 

Sorry that the facts are pain, but there it is and all readers of experince 
know this to be real.

Thoms.

 BAX! Names Allentown
http://www.bax-names-allentown.com
Computer setup, training, software and services
Coming soon: BAX-Mail - free web email under the BAX TLD.




________________________________
From: Joe Baptista <baptista@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
To: Thomas Baxter <baxtertms@xxxxxxxxx>
Cc: POST-TO GNSO LIST <ga@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Fri, April 2, 2010 10:23:48 PM
Subject: Re: OT: another moment with John Palmer All Joe does is destroy -  
show me his positive aspects in the I.N.S. (was Re: OT - a moment with John  
Palmer Re: [ga] censorship among root servers)

Dear Mr. John Palmer a.k.a. Thomas Baxter:

I think it's an innovative approach sliming me while you market your services - 
but let's try to remain focused here. Your trying to sell people on using your 
"free" root services. My only question is - why should anyone trust you John 
Palmer or your alternate personality Thomas Baxter to provide them with DNS 
services?

I would trust OpenDNS and even some of the OpenNIC servers for DNS. But I would 
never trust a man like John Palmer who leaves me psychotic messages 
http://bit.ly/5KxboD ???

The provisioning of public DNS services "free" or "pay" is all about trust. 
Would you not agree Mr. Palmer a.k.a. Thomas Baxter. So once again I ask a 
simple question. Why should we trust you?

regards
joe baptista


On Fri, Apr 2, 2010 at 2:04 PM, Thomas Baxter <baxtertms@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

I dont see selling any root services here - the serverces are free to anyone 
>if they want to just change their dns settings in their computer.
>
>You can get access to stuff you dont have now like the http://lion-mail.net 
>which offers spam free
>private e mail and looks like you can win a new apple i pad by June 30 too. 
>
>This is one benefit that the I.N.S. should publisize - because not many people 
>have
>changed the dns settings, spammers cant get spams to your I.N.S. email addies. 
>
>But Joe, you are probably paid from icann to sabatage the I.N.S. This is true 
>or
>>you are sychotic, one of the two must be true.  So you shouldnt throw rocks
>at people who tried to make stuff work, like John and Bradley and
> Herman Xennt. 
>
>As much as I can tell, you have never created any values at all, all I see 
>from reviewing
>your posting on the internet from day zero is destruction from you.
>
>Show us all what you have built in the I.N.S.  - (I can hear crickets 
>chirpping...).
>
>Thoms.
>
> BAX! Names Allentown
>http://www.bax-names-allentown.com
>Computer setup, training, software and services
>Coming soon: BAX-Mail - free web email under the BAX TLD.
>
>
>
>
>
________________________________
From: Joe Baptista <baptista@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>To: Thomas Baxter
> <baxtertms@xxxxxxxxx>
>Cc: ga@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>Sent: Wed, March 31, 2010 7:16:28 AM
>Subject: Re: OT - a moment with John Palmer Re: [ga] censorship among root  
>servers
>
>>I'm not the one selling root services here. You and your primary personality 
>>Mr. Palmer are the ones using this forum to sell root services. So I ask you 
>>again the question you have avoided answering - why should we trust you Mr. 
>>Palmer?
>
>regards
>joe baptista
>
>
>On Wed, Mar 31, 2010 at 2:15 AM, Thomas Baxter <baxtertms@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
>Oh, so you have better root to use, then - please let us all know the ips of 
>the servers and we
>>will look in at it and see how much better. Oh, dont waste your time with 
>>recomending ICANN roots. t
>>>>
>>They are leaving out 90 percents of the TLDs
>>
>> BAX! Names Allentown
>>http://www.bax-names-allentown.com
>>Computer setup, training, software and services
>>>>
>>Coming soon: BAX-Mail - free web email under the BAX TLD.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>>>
________________________________
From: Joe Baptista
>> <baptista@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>>To: John Palmer <jpalmer@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>>>>
>>Cc: ga@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>Sent: Mon, March 29, 2010 7:43:10 AM
>>Subject: OT - a moment with John Palmer Re: [ga] censorship among root servers
>>
>>
>>>>Just to repeat my warning. Anyone willing to hand over resolution to 
>>>>WorldRoot or INAIC (a.k.a. Public-Root) is playing with fire.
>>
>>Once again John I ask you the questions I asked earlier. Why should we trust 
>>you or Herman and his posse to provide us with DNS service?
>>
>>Incidentally - who is this Herman chap. Does Herman have a full name :)
>>
>>John I ask you to remain focused on the discussion. More discussion on the 
>>topic and less advertisements if you don't mind.
>>
>>cheers
>>>>
>>
>>joe baptista 
>>
>>
>>On Sun, Mar 28, 2010 at 11:30 PM, John Palmer 
>><jpalmer@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>
>>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>This is what happens when you rely on one root 
>>>server network. This kind of thing is bound to happen. 
>>> 
>>>If you were using WorldRoot (http://worldroot.net) or PublicRoot 
>>>(http://www.public-root.com), you 
>>>would
>>>not be having so many problems.
>>> 
>>>My posse and I and Herman and his group of 
>>>engineers have been providing alternatives for years,
>>>in spite of Joe's best efforts to destroy our work. 
>>>
>>> 
>>>We're still here.
>>> 
>>>Our roots are still available.
>>> 
>>>And we have many more TLDs than ICANN.
>>> 
>>>Try lion-mail.net yet? You should. Works like a 
>>>charm.
>>> 
>>>Cheers,
>>>John
>>>----- Original Message ----- 
>>>>>>>>
>>>>From: Joe 
>>>>  Baptista 
>>>>To: Hugh Dierker 
>>>>Cc: ga@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx ; Andrew 
>>>>  McMeikan ; Rod Beckstrom 
>>>>Sent: Sunday, March 28, 2010 7:41 
>>>>PM
>>>>Subject: Re: [ga] censorship among root 
>>>>  servers
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>On Sun, Mar 28, 2010 at 3:36 PM, Hugh Dierker <hdierker2204@xxxxxxxxx> >>>> 
>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>Andy,
>>>>> 
>>>>>Is it possible that this censorship and suppression of the people 
>>>>>          is a good thing for the rest of us?  
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>
>>>>Hugh - we don't yet know what happened. And ICANN has been silent. It 
>>>>  could be anyone behind this. I have seen some supporting evidence 
>>>> claiming it 
>>>>  was the Chinese. But I won't put much reliance on that evidence. The 
>>>> claim is 
>>>>  that a gateway in China did this. We know the Chinese run their own root 
>>>>  independent of ICANN. Maybe this was just an accident and a faulty 
>>>> gateway 
>>>>  leaked the China DNS. It could be 
>>>>anything.
>>>>
>>>>
>>
>>
>>
>
>


<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>