<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
Re: [ga] Rod Beckstrom TM application
- To: Hugh Dierker <hdierker2204@xxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: Re: [ga] Rod Beckstrom TM application
- From: Antony Van Couvering <avc@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 16 Feb 2010 09:23:06 -0800
Hi Hugh,
We're all bullshitters sometimes (at least I am), and as you say there are
plenty in ICANN, so I agree with you say.
And that's why to me it's a Good Thing that the new CEO has a pretty advanced
sense of what bullshit means -- and a sense of humor about it.
Antony
On Feb 16, 2010, at 6:29 AM, Hugh Dierker wrote:
> Hi Anthony,
>
> My name is Eric and I am a bullshitter, ya I went to rehab, they called it
> law school, trouble is all I learned there was how to get away with it and
> make money.
>
> I know a lot of great bullshitters in ICANN. They may have a problem but as
> you point out below, they are generally good people with a problem,,,, who
> isn't? Those of us who get paid so much to work here on the GA often forget
> that the Internet is working and working quite well. All the top dawgs you
> mentioned were a part of that. Sure we found errors and find errors and
> sometime egos have not allowed those errors to be honestly addressed but all
> in all most of the folks are good people working hard -- sometimes that is
> easy to forget.
>
> This list is up and running. Beckstrom left it alone. Good for him.
>
> --- On Tue, 2/16/10, Antony Van Couvering <avc@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> From: Antony Van Couvering <avc@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Subject: Re: [ga] Rod Beckstrom TM application
> To: "GNSO GA Mailing List" <ga@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Date: Tuesday, February 16, 2010, 2:15 AM
>
>
> Hi George,
>
> If it's just between you and me, why copy it to the list?
>
> You have to have a special sense of humor not to miss the laugh value in a
> trademark registration of Bullshitter's Anonymous.
>
> I don't think it advocates bullshitting as a "foundation for life." It's a
> clear reference to a 12-step program for chronic bullshitters. Analogs are
> Alcoholics Anonymous, Narcotics Anonymous, etc. etc. Do you find that people
> often have to explain jokes to you?
>
> As for Beckstrom, I like him. I like his style, I like his smarts, I like
> that he can see over and beyond the little world that is ICANN. I have hopes
> for him. I especially like his speech to the CSIS recently. It's the best
> survey/intro to ICANN I've heard.
> http://csis.org/multimedia/video-icann-and-internet-ecosystem
>
> You ask, "Why didn't you slam Twomey when he was in power?"
>
> When ICANN does something I think is good, I like to say something positive.
> When the opposite is true, I say that too. And I have named names when it
> seemed merited. Including slamming Twomey (and Vint Cerf) when they were in
> power. I would have liked to praise them, but sometimes they really sucked:
>
> http://www.namesatwork.com/blog/2006/11/26/the-internet-is-made-out-of-bricks-not-tubes
>
> http://www.namesatwork.com/blog/2008/06/08/icann-constituencies-bad-idea-whose-time-has-gone
> http://www.namesatwork.com/blog/2008/04/02/domain-name-price-jump-moores-law-or-parkinsons-laws
> http://www.namesatwork.com/blog/2006/03/18/icanns-pillow-principle.
>
> By the way, keep up the good work finding all the criminal activities of the
> straight-faced corporations who drone on about the horrors of cybersquatting.
> I was sorry you turned the task over to ICANN staff instead of continuing
> yourself -- you're much better at it than they are. I couldn't find that
> comment again, though I searched for it -- could you post the URL? It's
> really very funny, I'd like to read it again.
>
> Best regards,
>
> Antony
>
>
> On Feb 15, 2010, at 9:09 AM, George Kirikos wrote:
>
> >
> > Hello,
> >
> > --- On Mon, 2/15/10, Antony Van Couvering <avc@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >> Hilarious! I love it. Welcome change from the
> >> straight-faced droning of the previous CEO.
> >
> > lol Antony. Just between you and me, why is it that the people that attempt
> > to put a "positive spin" on this revelation are also the same people who
> > are seeking a "gift from the King" from the "Royal Prerogative"? :-)
> >
> > http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Royal_Prerogative
> >
> > If the present King was naked, would you also describe it as a "welcome
> > change" from the overdressed past monarch? How is Beckstrom to interpret
> > your praise now, when you so easily slam the past CEO (who is now
> > powerless, and who didn't give you what you want) as "a straight-faced"
> > drone? Why didn't you slam Twomey when he was in power?
> >
> > It's easy to give fake praise to someone in power, when you want something.
> > Perhaps the BS is the only thing inflating his ego?
> >
> > http://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=bullshitter
> >
> > It's harder to stand up and say that the emperor has no clothes. Someone of
> > quality, someone with a sense of self awareness would rather have the
> > truth, so that they can improve themselves. BS can take one only so far,
> > it's a weak foundation for life.
> >
> > Amused,
> >
> > George Kirikos
> > http://www.leap.com/
> >
>
>
>
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|