Re: [ga] Danny's 10

[Joe Baptista <baptista@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Mr. Palmer - may I suggest you boys at the TLDA and INAIC practice what you
preach. Let's not forget the theft of TLDs you guys participated in i.e.
those of Eric MacIver formerly of Nameslinger as well as those of others.
It's like the pot calling the kettle black.

Until then the following message left on my answering machine is all the
credibility you have in this.

http://bit.ly/5KxboD

regards
joe baptista

On Tue, Dec 8, 2009 at 1:09 PM, John Palmer <jpalmer@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> wrote:

>  11. Preventing ICANN from stealing TLDs that others already operate. 
> Exsisting TLD
> operators should not have to
> pay extortion money to ICANN to keep from having the 900lb gorilla (i.e.
> listing of a colliding version of their TLD in
> the USG root) from being dropped on their head.
>
> This, in my opinion, should be the FIRST item on the list for this group.
>
> ----- Original Message -----
>
> *From:* Hugh Dierker <hdierker2204@xxxxxxxxx>
> *To:* Accountability Headquarters <ga@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> *Sent:* Tuesday, December 08, 2009 6:57 AM
> *Subject:* [ga] Danny's 10
>
>   Sometimes participation here seems wasted. Sometimes participation here
> is required to keep this forum alive. One thing I promise,, anything done in
> GA does not stay here.
>
>
> 1.  we continue to have ongoing violations of inter-registrar transfer
> consensus policy by GoDadddy (through their 60-day lock upon WHOIS change)
> in spite of the April 2008 Advisory on the topic.
>
> *1. continuing inter-registrar transfer violations 4/08 Advisory*
> 2.  there is a need to establish a process to appoint an at-large director
>
> *2. At-large director appointment - when and how*
> 3.  there remains a need for ongoing discussion regarding the proposed URS
> take-down mechanism
>
> *3. URS Takedown - right/wrong   how/when*
> 4.  The UDRP has never been revised
>
> *4. UDRP revisions - success & failure examples/proof*
> 5.  The "open-the-floodgates" approach to new gTLDs is not a prudent policy
>
> *5. gTLDs to limit/restrict or Laissez faire*
> 6.  The ability of the Compliance Department to properly scale in light of
> a new TLD roll-out is at issue when they obviously can't manage their
> current responsibilities.
>
> *6. Compliance Department or Not - effectiveness & management*
> 7.  The EDDP requires registrars to post on their website the actual fees
> charged to registered name holders for recovering domain names that are in
> RGP.  Close to 500 registrars are in default of their obligations.
>
> *7. EDDP & the RGP *practical or superfluos
> 8.  We still have no registrants constituency in the GNSO
>
> *8. Registrants representation*
> 9.  The registry/registrar vertical integration discussion is far from
> concluded
>
> *9. Monopolistic vertical registry to registrar models*
> 10.  There is no GNSO-approved policy regarding proxy registrations.
> *10. Lack of GNSO effective registration policy*
>
>
>


-- 
Joe Baptista

www.publicroot.org
PublicRoot Consortium
----------------------------------------------------------------
The future of the Internet is Open, Transparent, Inclusive, Representative &
Accountable to the Internet community @large.
----------------------------------------------------------------
 Office: +1 (360) 526-6077 (extension 052)
    Fax: +1 (509) 479-0084

Personal: http://baptista.cynikal.net/