<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
Re: [ga] Danny's 10
- To: Hugh Dierker <hdierker2204@xxxxxxxxx>, Accountability Headquarters <ga@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, icann-board@xxxxxxxxx
- Subject: Re: [ga] Danny's 10
- From: "Jeffrey A. Williams" <jwkckid1@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 8 Dec 2009 14:00:46 -0600 (GMT-06:00)
<HEAD>
<STYLE>body{font-family:
Geneva,Arial,Helvetica,sans-serif;font-size:10pt;font-family:arial,sans-serif;background-color:#ffffff;color:black;}p{margin:0px}</STYLE>
<META content="MSHTML 6.00.6000.16825" name=GENERATOR></HEAD>
<BODY id=compText>
<P>Eric and all,</P>
<P> </P>
<P> As you and we all know ICANN has failed to address many of the issue
items you listed below,</P>
<P>some for a number of years now such as the UDRP and takedown URS
procedures/justifications</P>
<P>even though the GA members have provided a number of comments, ideas, ect.
towards same.</P>
<P> </P>
<P> Further as you know the UK in particular has decided not to wait any
longer on ICANN with</P>
<P>regard to URS takedown proceedures and has very recently taken down some
1,200 Domains</P>
<P>accordingly. Such an action and practice demonstrates to me anyway,
that ICANN's leadership</P>
<P>is grossly out of touch with effected and relevant government authorities
accordingly and further</P>
<P>demonstrates the need for the UDRP to be significantly re-reviewed and
subsequently significantly</P>
<P>modified. <BR><BR><BR></P>
<BLOCKQUOTE style="PADDING-LEFT: 5px; MARGIN-LEFT: 0px; BORDER-LEFT: #0000ff
2px solid">-----Original Message----- <BR>From: Hugh Dierker
<HDIERKER2204@xxxxxxxxx><BR>Sent: Dec 8, 2009 6:57 AM <BR>To: Accountability
Headquarters <GA@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx><BR>Subject: [ga] Danny's 10 <BR><BR>
<TABLE cellSpacing=0 cellPadding=0 border=0>
<TBODY>
<TR>
<TD vAlign=top>
<DIV>Sometimes participation here seems wasted. Sometimes participation here is
required to keep this forum alive. One thing I promise,, anything done in GA
does not stay here.</DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<P class=MsoNormal style="MARGIN: 0in 0in 0pt"><SPAN style="FONT-SIZE: 10pt;
FONT-FAMILY: 'Arial','sans-serif'">1. we continue to have ongoing
violations of inter-registrar transfer consensus policy by GoDadddy (through
their 60-day lock upon WHOIS change) in spite of the April 2008 Advisory on the
topic.<?xml:namespace prefix = o ns = "urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:office"
/><o:p></o:p></SPAN>
<DIV></DIV>
<P class=MsoNormal style="MARGIN: 0in 0in 0pt"><STRONG><SPAN style="FONT-SIZE:
10pt; FONT-FAMILY: 'Arial','sans-serif'">1. continuing inter-registrar transfer
violations 4/08 Advisory</SPAN></STRONG><SPAN style="FONT-SIZE: 10pt;
FONT-FAMILY: 'Arial','sans-serif'"><BR>2. there is a need to establish a
process to appoint an at-large director<o:p></o:p></SPAN>
<DIV></DIV>
<P class=MsoNormal style="MARGIN: 0in 0in 0pt"><STRONG><SPAN style="FONT-SIZE:
10pt; FONT-FAMILY: 'Arial','sans-serif'">2. At-large director appointment -
when and how</SPAN></STRONG><SPAN style="FONT-SIZE: 10pt; FONT-FAMILY:
'Arial','sans-serif'"><BR>3. there remains a need for ongoing discussion
regarding the proposed URS take-down mechanism<o:p></o:p></SPAN>
<DIV></DIV>
<P class=MsoNormal style="MARGIN: 0in 0in 0pt"><STRONG><SPAN style="FONT-SIZE:
10pt; FONT-FAMILY: 'Arial','sans-serif'">3. URS Takedown -
right/wrong how/when</SPAN></STRONG><SPAN style="FONT-SIZE: 10pt;
FONT-FAMILY: 'Arial','sans-serif'"><BR>4. The UDRP has never been
revised<o:p></o:p></SPAN>
<DIV></DIV>
<P class=MsoNormal style="MARGIN: 0in 0in 0pt"><STRONG><SPAN style="FONT-SIZE:
10pt; FONT-FAMILY: 'Arial','sans-serif'">4. UDRP revisions - success &
failure examples/proof</SPAN></STRONG><SPAN style="FONT-SIZE: 10pt;
FONT-FAMILY: 'Arial','sans-serif'"><BR>5. The "open-the-floodgates"
approach to new gTLDs is not a prudent policy<o:p></o:p></SPAN>
<DIV></DIV>
<P class=MsoNormal style="MARGIN: 0in 0in 0pt"><STRONG><SPAN style="FONT-SIZE:
10pt; FONT-FAMILY: 'Arial','sans-serif'">5. gTLDs to limit/restrict or Laissez
faire</SPAN></STRONG><SPAN style="FONT-SIZE: 10pt; FONT-FAMILY:
'Arial','sans-serif'"><BR>6. The ability of the Compliance Department to
properly scale in light of a new TLD roll-out is at issue when they obviously
can't manage their current responsibilities.<o:p></o:p></SPAN>
<DIV></DIV>
<P class=MsoNormal style="MARGIN: 0in 0in 0pt"><STRONG><SPAN style="FONT-SIZE:
10pt; FONT-FAMILY: 'Arial','sans-serif'">6. Compliance Department or Not -
effectiveness & management</SPAN></STRONG><SPAN style="FONT-SIZE: 10pt;
FONT-FAMILY: 'Arial','sans-serif'"><BR>7. The EDDP requires registrars to
post on their website the actual fees charged to registered name holders for
recovering domain names that are in RGP. Close to 500 registrars are in
default of their obligations.<o:p></o:p></SPAN>
<DIV></DIV>
<P class=MsoNormal style="MARGIN: 0in 0in 0pt"><STRONG><SPAN style="FONT-SIZE:
10pt; FONT-FAMILY: 'Arial','sans-serif'">7. EDDP & the RGP
</SPAN></STRONG><SPAN style="FONT-SIZE: 10pt; FONT-FAMILY:
'Arial','sans-serif'">practical or superfluos<BR>8. We still have no
registrants constituency in the GNSO<o:p></o:p></SPAN>
<DIV></DIV>
<P class=MsoNormal style="MARGIN: 0in 0in 0pt"><STRONG><SPAN style="FONT-SIZE:
10pt; FONT-FAMILY: 'Arial','sans-serif'">8. Registrants
representation</SPAN></STRONG><SPAN style="FONT-SIZE: 10pt; FONT-FAMILY:
'Arial','sans-serif'"><BR>9. The registry/registrar vertical integration
discussion is far from concluded<o:p></o:p></SPAN>
<DIV></DIV>
<P class=MsoNormal style="MARGIN: 0in 0in 0pt"><STRONG><SPAN style="FONT-SIZE:
10pt; FONT-FAMILY: 'Arial','sans-serif'">9. Monopolistic vertical registry to
registrar models</SPAN></STRONG><SPAN style="FONT-SIZE: 10pt; FONT-FAMILY:
'Arial','sans-serif'"><BR>10. There is no GNSO-approved policy regarding
proxy registrations.<o:p></o:p></SPAN>
<DIV></DIV>
<DIV><STRONG><SPAN style="FONT-SIZE: 10pt; FONT-FAMILY: 'Arial','sans-serif';
mso-fareast-font-family: 'Times New Roman'; mso-ansi-language: EN-US;
mso-fareast-language: EN-US; mso-bidi-language: AR-SA">10. Lack of GNSO
effective registration policy</SPAN></STRONG><SPAN style="FONT-SIZE: 10pt;
FONT-FAMILY: 'Arial','sans-serif'; mso-fareast-font-family: 'Times New Roman';
mso-ansi-language: EN-US; mso-fareast-language: EN-US; mso-bidi-language:
AR-SA"><BR style="mso-special-character: line-break"><BR
style="mso-special-character:
line-break"></SPAN></DIV></TD></TR></TBODY></TABLE><BR>Regards,<BR><BR>Jeffrey
A. Williams<BR>Spokesman for INEGroup LLA. - (Over 294k members/stakeholders
strong!)<BR>"Obedience of the law is the greatest freedom" -<BR>
Abraham Lincoln<BR><BR>"Credit should go with the performance of duty and not
with what is very<BR>often the accident of glory" - Theodore
Roosevelt<BR><BR>"If the probability be called P; the injury, L; and the
burden, B; liability<BR>depends upon whether B is less than L multiplied
by<BR>P: i.e., whether B is less than PL."<BR>United States v. Carroll
Towing (159 F.2d 169 [2d Cir.
1947]<BR>===============================================================<BR>Updated
1/26/04<BR>CSO/DIR. Internet Network Eng. SR. Eng. Network data security IDNS.
div. of<BR>Information Network Eng. INEG. INC.<BR>ABA member in good
standing member ID 01257402 E-Mail jwkckid1@xxxxxxxxxxxxx<BR>Phone:
214-244-4827<BR></BLOCKQUOTE></BODY>
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|