<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
RE: [ga] Re: Update
- To: Danny Younger <dannyyounger@xxxxxxxxx>, Dominik Filipp <dominik.filipp@xxxxxxxx>
- Subject: RE: [ga] Re: Update
- From: Hugh Dierker <hdierker2204@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 9 Dec 2009 06:03:09 -0800 (PST)
What board members have indicated a willingness to allow a registrants support
group?
--- On Wed, 12/9/09, Dominik Filipp <dominik.filipp@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
From: Dominik Filipp <dominik.filipp@xxxxxxxx>
Subject: RE: [ga] Re: Update
To: "Hugh Dierker" <hdierker2204@xxxxxxxxx>, "Danny Younger"
<dannyyounger@xxxxxxxxx>
Cc: ga@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Date: Wednesday, December 9, 2009, 12:51 AM
Eric,
No, I’m not saying it is cool. On the other hand, some progress is noticeable;
two-house GNSO model with acceptable stakeholder representation seems to be
approved by the board. The constituency representation in the non-contracted
non-commercial ‘half-house’ is not clear yet but it’s on the table. If
hard-wire nomination of GNSO councilors proposed by SICK will be replaced by
some sort of transparent election then we can perhaps start getting champagne
corks popped... not to enjoy too soon though.
Dominik
From: Hugh Dierker [mailto:hdierker2204@xxxxxxxxx]
Sent: Tuesday, December 08, 2009 11:25 PM
To: Danny Younger; Dominik Filipp
Cc: ga@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: RE: [ga] Re: Update
Dominik,
Did I get this straight? You are saying 2 months is cool? Seems to me that
the board has had 10 years to decide this issue. It began when both Peter and
Jon were alive. Ester and Vinton are both still here and the registrants are
not.
--- On Tue, 12/8/09, Dominik Filipp <dominik.filipp@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
From: Dominik Filipp <dominik.filipp@xxxxxxxx>
Subject: RE: [ga] Re: Update
To: "Danny Younger" <dannyyounger@xxxxxxxxx>, "Hugh Dierker"
<hdierker2204@xxxxxxxxx>
Cc: ga@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Date: Tuesday, December 8, 2009, 6:50 AM
Ok, thanks Danny.
Dominik
-----Original Message-----
From: Danny Younger [mailto:dannyyounger@xxxxxxxxx]
Sent: Tuesday, December 08, 2009 3:13 PM
To: Hugh Dierker; Dominik Filipp
Cc: ga@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: RE: [ga] Re: Update
Dominik,
I received no formal response, only a note that the letter had been
distributed to the entire board (as opposed to only to the Structural
Improvements Committee).
-- Danny --
--- On Tue, 12/8/09, Dominik Filipp <dominik.filipp@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
> From: Dominik Filipp <dominik.filipp@xxxxxxxx>
> Subject: RE: [ga] Re: Update
> To: "Danny Younger" <dannyyounger@xxxxxxxxx>, "Hugh Dierker"
<hdierker2204@xxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: ga@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Date: Tuesday, December 8, 2009, 9:05 AM
> Danny,
>
> Was there any response on the letter as it is dated about
> two months
> ago?
>
> Dominik
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-ga@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> [mailto:owner-ga@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx]
> On Behalf
> Of Danny Younger
> Sent: Tuesday, December 08, 2009 2:40 PM
> To: Hugh Dierker
> Cc: ga@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: [ga] Re: Update
>
> Eric,
>
> Please take note of the attached correspondence that was
> earlier
> submitted to the Board's Structural Improvements Committee
> -- it should
> answer some of your questions.
>
> -- Danny --
>
>
__________ Informacia od ESET NOD32 Antivirus, verzia databazy 4671 (20091208)
__________
Tuto spravu preveril ESET NOD32 Antivirus.
http://www.eset.sk
__________ Informacia od ESET NOD32 Antivirus, verzia databazy 4671 (20091208)
__________
Tuto spravu preveril ESET NOD32 Antivirus.
http://www.eset.sk
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|