Re: [ga] Google Public DNS

[Hugh Dierker <hdierker2204@xxxxxxxxx>]

Andy,
 
I suppose the question is; What innocuous stand is ICANN going to take on this 
clear addressing issue.  (there is a condo {modern day puebla structure for 
community} and all the US mail for 4k residents gets deposited in a central 
leasing office distribuiton center within the complex -- and then is 
distributed throughout the complex to the addressees--and the reverse is also 
true  -- now the leasing office decides to change who gets what and what gets 
sent out to whom)  What would the USPS say of such things?

--- On Thu, 12/3/09, Andy Gardner <andy@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:


From: Andy Gardner <andy@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [ga] Google Public DNS
To: "ga@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx >> GA" <ga@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thursday, December 3, 2009, 4:21 PM




On Dec 3, 2009, at 5:07 PM, Bashar Al-Abdulhadi wrote:
> 
> they are making big fuzz out of it and educating customers NOT to trust
> their ISPs that they pay them money yet trust some free provider out
> there?
> 
> sounds a bit weird to me overall.

Google's current browser plug-in hijacks website's 404 pages and redirects them 
to Google instead.

I think we can guess what they're intending to do with DNS errors.