ICANN/GNSO GNSO Email List Archives

[ga]


<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

RE: [ga] Transparent & Accountability

  • To: "tim@xxxxxxxxxxx" <tim@xxxxxxxxxxx>, "stephane.vangelder@xxxxxxxxx" <stephane.vangelder@xxxxxxxxx>, Danny Younger <dannyyounger@xxxxxxxxx>, Adrian Kinderis <adrian@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Subject: RE: [ga] Transparent & Accountability
  • From: Hugh Dierker <hdierker2204@xxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Thu, 8 Oct 2009 05:55:46 -0700 (PDT)

Very good point.  I focused on the now, because it is my understanding that the 
work is being done at this time and that Danny & Joop are doing it.  The 
problem I was gently addressing was that there does not seem to be any public 
and transparent work being done.

--- On Thu, 10/8/09, Adrian Kinderis <adrian@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:


From: Adrian Kinderis <adrian@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: RE: [ga] Transparent & Accountability
To: "Hugh Dierker" <hdierker2204@xxxxxxxxx>, "tim@xxxxxxxxxxx" 
<tim@xxxxxxxxxxx>, "stephane.vangelder@xxxxxxxxx" 
<stephane.vangelder@xxxxxxxxx>, "Danny Younger" <dannyyounger@xxxxxxxxx>
Cc: "ga@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx" <ga@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thursday, October 8, 2009, 3:39 AM








Why hope for just the ‘initial organisational process transparent’? Seems like 
you are either restricting your goals or haven’t really thought through your 
criticisms.
 
If that is the case it is my hope that the post initial organisational process 
is opaque.
 
Regards,
 
 
Adrian Kinderis


 

From: Hugh Dierker [mailto:hdierker2204@xxxxxxxxx] 
Sent: Thursday, 8 October 2009 4:37 PM
To: tim@xxxxxxxxxxx; stephane.vangelder@xxxxxxxxx; Adrian Kinderis; Danny 
Younger
Cc: ga@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [ga] Transparent & Accountability
 





Transparency and Accountability

 

That which is neither seen nor heard, cannot be accounted for by another.  The 
new era of accountability will require stakeholders like Registrars and NCUC to 
be more transparent and accountable.

 

I believe that one of the characteristics that the muckity mucks do not like 
about the GA is it's long standing history of transparency. I think the new 
constituencies or whatever they may be called should take a good hard look at 
the pros & cons of such transparency.

 

It is my hope that the formation and founding of new groups within ICANN 
maintain the integrity desired by keeping the initial organizational 
process transparent.

--- On Tue, 10/6/09, Danny Younger <dannyyounger@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:


From: Danny Younger <dannyyounger@xxxxxxxxx>
Subject: [ga] Transparent Registrar Constituency Mailing List
To: tim@xxxxxxxxxxx, stephane.vangelder@xxxxxxxxx, adrian@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Cc: ga@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Date: Tuesday, October 6, 2009, 3:40 PM


To the members of the Registrar Constituency,

Back in January, your constituency submitted a re-confirmation notice to the 
ICANN board.  In that document (in the Transparency Section), you indicated 
that a mailing-list archive will be featured in the next iteration of the 
constituency's website.  

It's now almost nine months later, and many of us are wondering whether your 
constituency will soon be giving birth to a publicly accessible fully 
transparent archive.

Looking forward to the actualization of your commitment to transparency to the 
maximum extent feasible...

best regards,
Danny Younger








      
 


      


<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>