<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
Re: [ga] 7. The EDDP & RGP
- To: "Karl E. Peters" <karl.peters@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: Re: [ga] 7. The EDDP & RGP
- From: Joe Baptista <baptista@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sun, 4 Oct 2009 20:25:05 -0400
Karl:
I really do think you should focus your efforts on the TLDA. Because that is
exactly what has happened to that HEX ridden organization. You have lost all
your members the communities confidence. So your essentially proposing below
that people do the same to GoDaddy as they did at the TLDA.
Won't work - does not scale. GoDaddy has good rates. And it does not matter
where they go they all pay the ICANN tax. As an executive director of the
TLDA you should know that. Should you not.
Cheers
Joe Baptista
On Sun, Oct 4, 2009 at 7:29 PM, Karl E. Peters <tlda@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>wrote:
>
> The question no one is asking here is, were GoDaddy to go away or stop
> marketing domains, would their clients not register them elsewhere and
> thus pay the same fee? I imagine MOST would simply register somewhere
> else for a dollar more. GoDaddy's guilt or innocence can hardly be
> verified or the suspicion heightened by the sheer size of the operation,
> unless there were a simple and unlikely pay-off. The fess they collect
> would be collected in the same amount for ICANN by anyone people went to
> in GoDaddy's absence.
>
> Karl E. Peters
>
> E-Mail: karl.peters@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Tel.: (843) 610-2608 (Cel.)
> Tel.: (912) 638-1638 (Tel.)
>
>
>
> > -------- Original Message --------
> > Subject: Re: [ga] 7. The EDDP & RGP
> > From: "Jeffrey A. Williams" <jwkckid1@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > Date: Sun, October 04, 2009 4:45 pm
> > To: Andy Gardner <andy@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Accountability
> > Headquarters <ga@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, rod_beckstrom@xxxxxxxxx,
> > ssene@xxxxxxxxxxxx
> > Cc: icann address <icann-board@xxxxxxxxx>
> >
> >
> > Andy and all,
> >
> > Technically and operationally your of course quite right.
> > None the less as a "Bag Man" for ICANN their practices towards
> > registrants, despite their marketing jargon, is horrendously
> > abusive. As such, as on of the "Bag Men" for ICANN's coffers
> > through registration fees/tax, it would seem to me that GoDaddy
> > is of dubious ethics and therefore quality as a result in part
> > of their largess as a "Bag Man" for ICANN.
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > >From: Andy Gardner <andy@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > >Sent: Oct 3, 2009 4:11 PM
> > >To: Accountability Headquarters <ga@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>,
> rod_beckstrom@xxxxxxxxx, ssene@xxxxxxxxxxxx
> > >Cc: icann address <icann-board@xxxxxxxxx>
> > >Subject: Re: [ga] 7. The EDDP & RGP
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >On Oct 3, 2009, at 3:15 PM, Jeffrey A. Williams wrote:
> > >
> > >> Eric and all,
> > >>
> > >> However
> > >> the biggest Registrar offender GoDaddy remains "Untouchable". One
> > >> has to wonder if that
> > >> fact is due to GoDaddy's largess as a Registrar and the revinue it
> > >> provides to ICANN in terms
> > >> of fees isn't the reason little effective action has been taken
> > >> accordingly/
> > >>
> > >
> > >Godaddy doesn't provide ICANN with revenue. They're just tax collectors.
> > >
> > >The unrepresented registrants are the revenue source.
> > >
> > >Let's not forget that.
> > >
> > >
> > Regards,
> >
> > Jeffrey A. Williams
> > Spokesman for INEGroup LLA. - (Over 294k members/stakeholders strong!)
> > "Obedience of the law is the greatest freedom" -
> > Abraham Lincoln
> >
> > "Credit should go with the performance of duty and not with what is very
> > often the accident of glory" - Theodore Roosevelt
> >
> > "If the probability be called P; the injury, L; and the burden, B;
> liability
> > depends upon whether B is less than L multiplied by
> > P: i.e., whether B is less than PL."
> > United States v. Carroll Towing (159 F.2d 169 [2d Cir. 1947]
> > ===============================================================
> > Updated 1/26/04
> > CSO/DIR. Internet Network Eng. SR. Eng. Network data security IDNS. div.
> of
> > Information Network Eng. INEG. INC.
> > ABA member in good standing member ID 01257402 E-Mail
> jwkckid1@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > Phone: 214-244-4827
>
>
>
--
Joe Baptista
www.publicroot.org
PublicRoot Consortium
----------------------------------------------------------------
The future of the Internet is Open, Transparent, Inclusive, Representative &
Accountable to the Internet community @large.
----------------------------------------------------------------
Office: +1 (360) 526-6077 (extension 052)
Fax: +1 (509) 479-0084
Personal: www.joebaptista.wordpress.com
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|