ICANN/GNSO GNSO Email List Archives


<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

[ga] Danny's list

  • To: Accountability Headquarters <ga@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Subject: [ga] Danny's list
  • From: Hugh Dierker <hdierker2204@xxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Thu, 1 Oct 2009 16:17:53 -0700 (PDT)

Please take a look on this list again, give it some thoughts (just two or 
three) and start holding ICANN accountable for their action in an area.
1.  we continue to have ongoing violations of inter-registrar transfer 
consensus policy by GoDadddy (through their 60-day lock upon WHOIS change) in 
spite of the April 2008 Advisory on the topic.
1. continuing inter-registrar transfer violations 4/08 Advisory
2.  there is a need to establish a process to appoint an at-large director
2. At-large director appointment - when and how
3.  there remains a need for ongoing discussion regarding the proposed URS 
take-down mechanism
3. URS Takedown - right/wrong   how/when
4.  The UDRP has never been revised
4. UDRP revisions - success & failure examples/proof
5.  The "open-the-floodgates" approach to new gTLDs is not a prudent policy
5. gTLDs to limit/restrict or Liaises fa ire
6.  The ability of the Compliance Department to properly scale in light of a 
new TOLD roll-out is at issue when they obviously can't manage their current 
6. Compliance Department or Not - effectiveness & management
7.  The ED DP requires registrars to post on their website the actual fees 
charged to registered name holders for recovering domain names that are in GP.  
Close to 500 registrars are in default of their obligations.
7. EDDP & the RGP practical or superfluous
8.  We still have no registrants constituency in the GNSO
8. Registrants representation
9.  The registry/registrar vertical integration discussion is far from concluded
9. Monopolistic vertical registry to registrar models
10.  There is no GNSO-approved policy regarding proxy registrations.
10. Lack of GNSO effective registration policy


<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>