Re: [ga] George is being used. It's time to close down this list.
- To: ga@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx, ChuckGomes <cgomes@xxxxxxxxxxxx>, George Kirikos <gkirikos@xxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: Re: [ga] George is being used. It's time to close down this list.
- From: Hugh Dierker <hdierker2204@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 24 Sep 2009 18:56:04 -0700 (PDT)
Just what we need. Less voice for individuals and more of a voice for
constituents. And maybe we could make all the constituents require all
participants to vote democrat in the US. Or socialist in Italy. And maybe we
could then require them to pay a fee and be born with a pedigree from royalty
or have an accounting degree. The restrictions on individual participation are
endless, and ICANN won't need to do it, they can have George and Chuck do it.
But first lets give the GA list some voting mechanisms and say it was all
because of George and so we support his election. How often have we seen this
scenario. But first they attack all of us who decent and say we are not people
or we just do this because we are mentally unfit.
--- On Thu, 9/24/09, George Kirikos <gkirikos@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
From: George Kirikos <gkirikos@xxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [ga] George was right. It's time to close down this list.
To: ga@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx, "ChuckGomes" <cgomes@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thursday, September 24, 2009, 1:52 PM
--- On Thu, 9/24/09, Gomes, Chuck wrote:
> I would George if it can be effectively
> designed and I think it can. As chair of the GNSO
> Operations Steering Committee I will forward your message to
> the Communications work team because it fits into their
> tasks well. In fact, it may already be on their
Thanks Chuck. I don't believe it would be very difficult. One would set the
mailing list options in majordomo (or mailman, or other list management
programs) to not automatically approve new subscribers, but instead hold them
in a moderation queue. Each constituency would be able to have someone in the
moderation queue (moderation just for subscriptions, not for each actual
post!), and that person could verify whether a new subscriber was a
constituency member. If so, they'd approve that new subscriber.
One could have a separate process for "special" people, e.g. former Board
members, etc. (are Vint Cerf or Esther Dyson still following ICANN?) who wish
to stay involved or at least stay subscribed.