<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
Re: [ga] Will Twomey really leave ICANN?
- To: GNSO GA Mailing List <ga@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Joop Teernstra <terastra@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: Re: [ga] Will Twomey really leave ICANN?
- From: Hugh Dierker <hdierker2204@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 5 Jun 2009 18:11:30 -0700 (PDT)
It is the overall direction, without shame, that makes Twomey so depressing.
When you combine this with the new Verisign Security Dutchboy finger in a dike
routine, it just gets nauseating.
--- On Fri, 6/5/09, Joop Teernstra <terastra@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
From: Joop Teernstra <terastra@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [ga] Will Twomey really leave ICANN?
To: "George Kirikos" <gkirikos@xxxxxxxxx>, "GNSO GA Mailing List"
<ga@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Friday, June 5, 2009, 4:17 PM
Thanks George, for the link to those videos.
http://energycommerce.house.gov/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=1642&catid=134&Itemid=74Also
interesting how Godaddy describes itself as ICANN's biggest benefactor.I guess
when you are a non-profit, the MLM system becomes layers ofbenefactors.What is
Dr Lenard's organization? First time I hear of them. Perhaps a newtorch-bearer
for the unrepresented stakeholders, ah.. benefactors?Joop
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|