Re: [ga] Weekly posting summary for ga@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx additions

[Hugh Dierker <hdierker2204@xxxxxxxxx>]

Mr. Narten,
 
Thank you for your continued contribution to this list.
 
Would it be terrible difficult for you to arrange a similar list showing the 
"hits"  to the GA list under the GNSO. I think the statistics on monitoring 
would actually be more helpful and show the a more important story. Especially 
to show to onlookers the actual public participation.
 
Statistics are marvelous, unless skewed to prove one point or the other. 
 
I hope your affiliation here does not do harm to your ICANN standing.

--- On Thu, 4/16/09, Thomas Narten <narten@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

From: Thomas Narten <narten@xxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: [ga] Weekly posting summary for ga@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To: ga@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Date: Thursday, April 16, 2009, 9:53 PM

Total of 49 messages in the last 7 days.
 
script run at: Fri Apr 17 00:53:02 EDT 2009
 
    Messages   |      Bytes        | Who
--------+------+--------+----------+------------------------
 28.57% |   14 | 23.71% |   253911 | hdierker2204@xxxxxxxxx
 14.29% |    7 | 23.67% |   253446 | baptista@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
 12.24% |    6 | 23.07% |   247069 | debbie@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
 18.37% |    9 |  7.32% |    78425 | jwkckid1@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
 12.24% |    6 |  4.25% |    45476 | gkirikos@xxxxxxxxx
  2.04% |    1 |  8.26% |    88422 | theresa@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
  2.04% |    1 |  4.73% |    50616 | dominik.filipp@xxxxxxxx
  2.04% |    1 |  2.43% |    25991 | jpalmer@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
  2.04% |    1 |  1.34% |    14378 | ross@xxxxxxxxxx
  2.04% |    1 |  0.46% |     4899 | narten@xxxxxxxxxx
  2.04% |    1 |  0.42% |     4523 | michele@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
  2.04% |    1 |  0.35% |     3718 | glen@xxxxxxxxx
--------+------+--------+----------+------------------------
100.00% |   49 |100.00% |  1070874 | Total