Re: [ga] Re: Mexico City question box responses

[Hugh Dierker <hdierker2204@xxxxxxxxx>]

George,
 
If an executive gets a comment/proposal or insight and his interest is at a 
pique.
And he wants to research as a good exec should.
Would not he assign it to a staffer to have a complete peek.
Shouldn't the staffer be doing all that he could.
To also assess the position and bona vides of the author of critique.
So that the exec would know exactly where he stood.
 
I do not follow your "Leap of Faith" that there is something sinister in the 
plot line.
I suppose I am also guilty as charged, as I can hit my email buttons and see 
all your posts and create a dossier on you. Admittedly I also have linkage to 
your web page/site and to your contributions elsewhere, freely provided by your 
own hand.
Worse yet: I still have visions of a negligee' clad Esther Dyson imprinted on 
my own memory banks, that was provided by our intellectual rabble rowsers on 
this list about a decade ago. 


--- On Fri, 4/10/09, George Kirikos <gkirikos@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

From: George Kirikos <gkirikos@xxxxxxxxx>
Subject: [ga] Re: Mexico City question box responses
To: participate@xxxxxxxxx
Cc: ga@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Date: Friday, April 10, 2009, 1:23 PM

Hello,

According to:

http://www.icann.org/en/participate/mexico-city-public-forum-response.html#5

Question: Why was ICANN staff researching George Kirikos' political views
on President Barack Obama? (as was verified by Apache webserver referrer logs)
Does ICANN keep a dossier on every community participant?

Attempted Answer: Information regarding any such search has not been provided
to ICANN. ICANN does not contract for, have access to, or maintain a dossier on
any community participant, including on their political views.

Since ICANN denies receiving such information, it was posted to the GA mailing
list on January 9, 2009:

http://gnso.icann.org/mailing-lists/archives/ga-200709/msg02413.html
http://www.webcitation.org/5fwEYlXUI
 
with the actual Apache webserver logs which contained IP address and
date/timestamp details. That would allow ICANN to determine who was responsible.

Sincerely,

George Kirikos
http://www.leap.com/

--- On Fri, 4/10/09, Kieren McCarthy <kieren.mccarthy@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> From: Kieren McCarthy <kieren.mccarthy@xxxxxxxxx>
> Subject: Mexico City question box responses
> To: "Kieren McCarthy" <kieren.mccarthy@xxxxxxxxx>
> Date: Friday, April 10, 2009, 3:39 PM
> Hello all,
> 
> Thank you very much for using the online question box for
> the recent ICANN meeting in Mexico City.
> 
> We have now published responses to all questions online at:
> http://www.icann.org/en/participate/mexico-city-public-forum-response.html
> 
> The layout should be pretty self-explanatory but if you
> have any question or queries, please do contact me.
> 
> We will be repeating the question box for the upcoming
> Sydney meeting in June, with one or two improvements and
> changes, so I hope you will take advantage of this
> participation tool there as well.
> 
> 
> Thanks
> 
> 
> Kieren McCarthy
> General manager of public participation, ICANN