<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
Re: [ga] ICANN delays new gTLDs?
- To: Joe Baptista <baptista@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "ICANN Admin supp. Manager Karen Lettner" <karen.lettner@xxxxxxxxx>, icann board <icann-board@xxxxxxxxx>, ICANN Policy staff <policy-staff@xxxxxxxxx>, "twomey@xxxxxxxxx" <twomey@xxxxxxxxx>, Peter Dengate Thrush <barrister@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Kieren McCarthy <kieren.mccarthy@xxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: Re: [ga] ICANN delays new gTLDs?
- From: "Jeffrey A. Williams" <jwkckid1@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 17 Feb 2009 14:59:46 -0800
Dr. Joe and all,
Spot on Dr. Joe! But than again, ICANN needs to have as many
excuses as it can muster, accurate/honest or not. We've seen this
song and dance before. A sad comentary indeed!
Joe Baptista wrote:
>
>
> On Wed, Feb 18, 2009 at 9:09 AM, George Kirikos <gkirikos@xxxxxxxxx>
> wrote:
>
>
> Journalists are reporting that ICANN has delayed new gTLDs
> and has published
> the second draft of the guidebook:
>
> http://www.vnunet.com/vnunet/news/
> 236683/icann-pushes-back-gtlds
>
>
> Thanks for the heads up George. One thing I did find in this article
> is a lot of misinformation in the finest of ICANN tradition.
>
> Karla Valente, a communications person with ICANN said "Even though
> [gTLDs] will not launch on 30 September, as we said in our Cairo
> meeting, we are still working internally to launch in 2009," she said.
> " However, some overarching issues could delay things." According to
> Valente these issues include the cost of registration, the market
> impact of the new gTLDs, and the technical impact, for example whether
> there is enough space on the Domain Name System to accommodate them.
>
> The last statement she made on whether there is enough space on the
> DNS to accommodate new TLDs is pure bullshit. As I have said time and
> time again the root dns can accommodate as many zones as one finds in
> the .com zone file. The technology to serve dns data at the root or
> TLD level is exactly the same. And its been proven already - the HEX
> in europe was an excellent example that the root can accommodate
> thousands if not millions of TLDs.
>
> How much longer will ICANN repeat this mantra of nonsense that there
> may be a limit to the number of TLDs that the root zone can
> accommodate?
>
> The truth behind this delay - one I welcome - is that ICANN is coming
> to terms with the overwhelming opposition and legal issues these new
> TLDs will cause. Also the war for control over the root is another
> factor. We'll see a show down between DOC and ICANN in 2009 which
> will to a large extent determine ICANN's future - or lack of it.
>
> regards
> joe baptista
>
>
>
> --
> Joe Baptista
> www.publicroot.org
> PublicRoot Consortium
> ----------------------------------------------------------------
> The future of the Internet is Open, Transparent, Inclusive,
> Representative & Accountable to the Internet community @large.
> ----------------------------------------------------------------
> Office: +1 (360) 526-6077 (extension 052)
> Fax: +1 (509) 479-0084
>
Regards,
Spokesman for INEGroup LLA. - (Over 284k members/stakeholders strong!)
"Obedience of the law is the greatest freedom" -
Abraham Lincoln
"YES WE CAN!" Barack ( Berry ) Obama
"Credit should go with the performance of duty and not with what is
very often the accident of glory" - Theodore Roosevelt
"If the probability be called P; the injury, L; and the burden, B;
liability depends upon whether B is less than L multiplied by
P: i.e., whether B is less than PL."
United States v. Carroll Towing (159 F.2d 169 [2d Cir. 1947]
===============================================================
Updated 1/26/04
CSO/DIR. Internet Network Eng. SR. Eng. Network data security IDNS.
div. of Information Network Eng. INEG. INC.
ABA member in good standing member ID 01257402 E-Mail
jwkckid1@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
My Phone: 214-244-4827
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|