<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
Re: [NA-Discuss] [ga] ICANN opens up Question Box for Mexico City meeting
- To: ga@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Subject: Re: [NA-Discuss] [ga] ICANN opens up Question Box for Mexico City meeting
- From: Danny Younger <dannyyounger@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 12 Feb 2009 17:44:55 -0800 (PST)
Another set of questions:
ALAC Review: “after a year since we first began asking, ICANN has not been
able to produce current or historical data on the cost of the ALAC”; Board
response?
Why did the Board decide to eliminate the Board Privacy Committee which was
first established at the recommendation of at-Large director Mueller-Maguhn? Is
privacy no longer an important consideration?
The stated goal of the WDRP Consensus Policy was to improve WHOIS accuracy. If
WHOIS accuracy has not improved, will ICANN direct the GNSO to revisit this
policy?
In the matter of the Independent Review Process before the International Centre
for Dispute, ICANN argues for a deferential standard of review. Is ICANN
unwilling to be held accountable?
How many cybersquatting-related lawsuits directed at registrars does ICANN need
to see before it realizes that ICANN action is warranted?
ICANN’s Articles of Incorporation require ICANN to determine the
“circumstances” under which new TLDs are added to the root. What specific
circumstances prompted the current new gTLD round?
Just curious… whatever happened with the Cross Registry Information Service
Protocol (CRISP)? Has anyone done anything with it?
RAA amendment: “Registrar shall provide on its website its accurate contact
details including valid email and mailing address.” Why won’t ICANN require
identification of registrar’s primary place of business?
Will ICANN’s new board-level Risk Committee be reporting to the community on
the risks associated with terminating the JPA?
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|