Re: [ga] ICANN opens up Question Box for Mexico City meeting

[Danny Younger <dannyyounger@xxxxxxxxx>]

Even more questions:

1. When can we anticipate a decision being reached on the topic of board member 
compensation?

2. Board’s thoughts on APWG’s Accelerated Domain Suspension Process proposal 
seeking to define accreditation requirements for entities that would expedite 
takedowns of domains used in phishing or malware distribution?

3. Strategic Plan:  “Clarify ICANN’s role in relation to consumer protection; 
develop a clear consensus position by the end of 2009.”  What is the Board’s 
current view on ICANN’s role?

4. PSC Discussion Proposal: Establish accountability mechanisms that allow the 
community to remove the Board collectively and reconstitute it.  When do you 
anticipate such a mechanism being in place?

5. ICANN sponsors regional registry/registrar gatherings.  Will it ever sponsor 
regional gatherings exclusive to the non-contracted parties?

6. ICANN’s Emergency Names and Addressing Committee (ENAC) supposedly includes 
1 appointed ALAC representative from each region.  Whom has the ALAC appointed 
to serve on this Committee?

7. Will the ICANN Compliance Department be willing to tell us how many domains 
have been cancelled in the last year as a result of WDPRS filings?

8. Will ICANN issue a specification requiring Registrars to allow folk to add 
AAAA glue for their Domain Name Servers by a fixed date?

9. The Independent Review of the Board of ICANN recommended to “Move to fewer 
but longer board meetings”; does the board agree or disagree?

10. GNSO Councilor comment:  “the RAA amendment consultative process 
essentially excluded registrants and users including brand owners, and ignored 
their input.”  Is the Board aware of such Staff mismanagement?