<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
RE: [ga] [Fwd: Re: [At-Large] [NA-Discuss] Still more folk complainingabout GoDaddy Transfer Policy Violations]
- To: "Jeffrey A. Williams" <jwkckid1@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: RE: [ga] [Fwd: Re: [At-Large] [NA-Discuss] Still more folk complainingabout GoDaddy Transfer Policy Violations]
- From: "Karl E. Peters" <tlda@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sun, 08 Feb 2009 20:14:24 -0700
<html><body><span style="font-family:Verdana; color:#000000;
font-size:10pt;"><div>Jeffrey,</div>
<div> Under the assumption that Go-Daddy is indeed
playing with SLDs as you describe, your points are well taken. The option so
heavily promoted when signing for an SLD with them, "private registrations"
(though I think it should not be allowed, personally) requires that some legal
authority be allowed to look at their books and those of their associated
private registration company to see who really paid for those registration, if
anyone, and if they are legitimately "owned" by real people or cleverly removed
from the general market to extract a higher price through forced negotiation
with an unpublished and only presumably real registrant.</div>
<div> In short, there may be a lot one could string up
Go-Daddy for, not to even mention their trashy advertisements, but there should
be a vehicle to acquire real proof before condemning them publicly on
assumptions.</div>
<div>-Karl E. Peters, President</div>
<div>Top Level Domain Association, Inc.</div>
<div> </div>
<div> </div>
<BLOCKQUOTE style="PADDING-LEFT: 8px; FONT-SIZE: 10pt; MARGIN-LEFT: 8px;
BORDER-LEFT: blue 2px solid; COLOR: black; FONT-FAMILY: verdana" webmail="1">
<div >-------- Original Message --------<BR>Subject: [ga] [Fwd: Re:
[At-Large] [NA-Discuss] Still more folk<BR>complainingabout GoDaddy Transfer
Policy Violations]<BR>From: "Jeffrey A. Williams"
<jwkckid1@xxxxxxxxxxxxx><BR>Date: Sat, February 07, 2009 10:19 pm<BR>To:
Ga <ga@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx><BR><BR><BR>All,<BR><BR>As an FYI and a positive
direction or solution.<BR><BR>-------- Original Message --------<BR>Subject:
Re: [At-Large] [NA-Discuss] Still more folk complainingabout<BR>GoDaddy
Transfer Policy Violations<BR>Date: Sat, 07 Feb 2009 15:34:57 -0800<BR>From:
"Jeffrey A. Williams" <jwkckid1@xxxxxxxxxxxxx><BR>Organization: IDNS and
Spokesman for INEGroup<BR>To: At-Large Worldwide
<at-large@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>,FTC OIG's<BR>office
<OIG@xxxxxxx>,icann board <icann-board@xxxxxxxxx>,ICANN
Policy<BR>staff <policy-staff@xxxxxxxxx>,Paul
Levins<BR><paul.levins@xxxxxxxxx>,Michele Neylon
<michele@xxxxxxxxxxxxx><BR>CC: "dannyyounger@xxxxxxxxx"
<dannyyounger@xxxxxxxxx>,NA
Discuss<BR><na-discuss@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>,GAC
Rep<BR><ssene@xxxxxxxxxxxx>,DOC/NTIA ICANN Rep
<aheineman@xxxxxxxxxxxx>,Tim<BR>Ruiz <tim@xxxxxxxxxxx>,"ICANN Admin
supp. Manager Karen Lettner"<BR><karen.lettner@xxxxxxxxx>,ICANN Dan
Halloran <halloran@xxxxxxxxx>,ICANN<BR>Kim Davies
<kim.davies@xxxxxxxxx>,icann legal
<jeffrey@xxxxxxxxx>,ICANN<BR>Marc Salvatierra
<marc.salvatierra@xxxxxxxxx>,ICANN Marilyn
Vernon<BR><marilyn.vernon@xxxxxxxxx>,"twomey@xxxxxxxxx"
<twomey@xxxxxxxxx>,Peter<BR>Dengate Thrush
<barrister@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>,"Karl E.
Peters"<BR><kpeters@xxxxxxxxxxx>,Hugh Dierker
<hdierker2204@xxxxxxxxx><BR>BCC: "Jacqueline A. Morris"
<jam@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>,John
L<BR><johnl@xxxxxxxx><BR>References:<BR><349640.11357.qm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>,<904113ab0901292020s348b53e2k7973f166f9aa01c@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx><BR><D175CB0A04FE634587DA0987F3C4231021F72234EF@iddawg.blacknight.local><BR><BR>Michele
and all,<BR><BR>My response interspersed below.<BR><BR>Michele Neylon ::
Blacknight wrote:<BR><BR>> Cheryl / Danny<BR>><BR>> GoDaddy is the
biggest ICANN registrar<BR><BR>Indeed it is.<BR><BR>><BR>><BR>> How
likely is it that ICANN will take any action against them?<BR><BR>Not likely as
the revenues that ICANN receives from GoDaddy are<BR>the most of any registrar.
And the way and manner in which ICANN<BR>burns $$ they need GoDaddy too badly.
Too big to fail, if you will...<BR>Sound/read
familiar?<BR><BR>><BR>><BR>> What options are open to ICANN to take
against them?<BR><BR>Several. But the best would be to de-accredit GoDaddy.
A<BR>VERY unlikely action by ICANN. Next would be to find<BR>a white knight to
come in and take over GoDaddy after requiring<BR>the owners and Sr. Executives
of GoDaddy to resign immediately<BR>or be
dis-accredited.<BR><BR>><BR>><BR>> The inter-registrar transfer policy
isn't part of the RAA, is it?<BR><BR>No, but the new proposed RAA has some
provisions dealing with<BR>inter-registrar transfer. My questions are: what
does ICANN propose<BR>to do for all those registrants that have been damaged by
GoDaddy's<BR>miss-behavior? Will ICANN be financially compensating
these<BR>registrants adequately, if at all?<BR><BR>><BR>><BR>>
Regards<BR>><BR>> Michele<BR>> --<BR>> Mr Michele Neylon<BR>>
Blacknight Solutions<BR>> Hosting & Colocation, Brand Protection<BR>>
<a href="http://www.blacknight.com/"; target=_blank
mce_href="http://www.blacknight.com/";>http://www.blacknight.com/</a><BR>> <a
href="http://blog.blacknight.com/"; target=_blank
mce_href="http://blog.blacknight.com/";>http://blog.blacknight.com/</a><BR>>
Intl. +353 (0) 59 9183072<BR>> Locall: 1850 929 929<BR>> Direct Dial:
+353 (0)59 9183090<BR>> Fax. +353 (0) 1 4811 763<BR>>
-------------------------------<BR>> Blacknight Internet Solutions Ltd, Unit
12A,Barrowside Business Park,Sleaty<BR>> Road,Graiguecullen,Carlow,Ireland
Company No.: 370845<BR>>
_______________________________________________<BR>> At-Large mailing
list<BR>> At-Large@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx<BR>> <a
href="http://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/at-large_atlarge-lists.icann.org";
target=_blank
mce_href="http://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/at-large_atlarge-lists.icann.org";>http://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/at-large_atlarge-lists.icann.org</a><BR>><BR>>
At-Large Official Site: <a href="http://atlarge.icann.org/"; target=_blank
mce_href="http://atlarge.icann.org";>http://atlarge.icann.org</a><BR><BR>Regards,<BR><BR>Spokesman
for INEGroup LLA. - (Over 284k members/stakeholders strong!)<BR>"Obedience of
the law is the greatest freedom" -<BR>Abraham Lincoln<BR>"YES WE CAN!" Barack (
Berry ) Obama<BR><BR>"Credit should go with the performance of duty and not
with what is<BR>very often the accident of glory" - Theodore
Roosevelt<BR><BR>"If the probability be called P; the injury, L; and the
burden, B;<BR>liability depends upon whether B is less than L multiplied
by<BR>P: i.e., whether B is less than PL."<BR>United States v. Carroll Towing
(159 F.2d 169 [2d Cir.
1947]<BR>===============================================================<BR>Updated
1/26/04<BR>CSO/DIR. Internet Network Eng. SR. Eng. Network data security
IDNS.<BR>div. of Information Network Eng. INEG. INC.<BR>ABA member in good
standing member ID 01257402 E-Mail<BR>jwkckid1@xxxxxxxxxxxxx<BR>My Phone:
214-244-4827<BR></DIV></BLOCKQUOTE></span></body></html>
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|