<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
Re: [ga] Re: [NA-Discuss] Open Letter on ICANN Non-Openness
- To: <dannyyounger@xxxxxxxxx>, "'NA Discuss'" <na-discuss@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: Re: [ga] Re: [NA-Discuss] Open Letter on ICANN Non-Openness
- From: "Elisabeth Porteneuve" <elisabeth.porteneuve@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 10 Sep 2008 18:13:26 +0200
----- Original Message -----
From: "Danny Younger" <dannyyounger@xxxxxxxxx>
To: "'NA Discuss'" <na-discuss@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: <ga@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Wednesday, September 10, 2008 4:15 PM
Subject: [ga] Re: [NA-Discuss] Open Letter on ICANN Non-Openness
I have received this note:
"The meeting being referred to (which I am presently at) is not an ICANN
meeting, nor organised by ICANN. There are a couple of invited ICANN guest
speakers, myself included, but it has been organised by the .RU registry."
Then why ICANN states on its very bad IDN-meetings page that ICANN is one of
organizers?
http://www.icann.org/en/topics/idn/meetings.htm
(plenty of broken URLs, inadequate title "2007 Schedule and ..." - phishing
for meetings ?)
Elisabeth Porteneuve
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|