[ga] Adopted resolutions by the ICANN Board in Paris on Thursday 26 June 2008.

[Glen de Saint Géry <Glen@xxxxxxxxx>]

[To: council[at]gnso.icann.org; liaison6c[at]gnso.icann.org]
[To: ga[at]gnso.icann.org; announce[at]gnso.icann.org]
[To: regional-liaisons[at]icann.org]

An extract of the adopted resolutions by the ICANN Board in Paris on Thursday 
26 June 2008.
http://www.icann.org/minutes/resolutions-26jun08.htm


Approval of Minutes
GNSO Recommendations on New gTLDs
IDNC / IDN Fast-track
GNSO Recommendation on Domain Tasting
Approval of Operating Plan and Budget for Fiscal Year 2008-2009
Update on Draft Amendments to the Registrar Accreditation Agreement
Approval of PIR Request to Implement DNSSEC in .ORG
ICANN Board of Directors' Code of Conduct
Ratification of Selection of Consultant to Conduct Independent Review of the 
Board
Appointment of Independent Review Working Groups
Update on Independent Reviews of ICANN Structures
Board Committee Assignment Revisions
Approval of BGC Recommendations on GNSO Improvements
Receipt of Report of President's Strategy Committee Consultation
Review of Paris Meeting Structure
Board Response to Discussions Arising from Paris Meeting
ICANN At-Large Summit Proposal
Other Business
Thanks to Steve Conte
Thanks to Sponsors
Thanks to Local Hosts, Staff, Scribes, Interpreters, Event Teams, and Others
Approval of Minutes
Resolved (2008.06.26.__), the minutes of the Board Meeting of 29 May 2008 are 
approved. <http://www.icann.org/minutes/prelim-report-29may08.htm>

GNSO Recommendations on New gTLDs
Whereas, the GNSO initiated a policy development process on the introduction of 
New gTLDs in December 2005. <http://gnso.icann.org/issues/new-gtlds/>

Whereas, the GNSO Committee on the Introduction of New gTLDs addressed a range 
of difficult technical, operational, legal, economic, and policy questions, and 
facilitated widespread participation and public comment throughout the process.

Whereas, the GNSO successfully completed its policy development process on the 
Introduction of New gTLDs and on 7 September 2007, and achieved a Supermajority 
vote on its 19 policy recommendations. 
<http://gnso.icann.org/meetings/minutes-gnso-06sep07.shtml>

Whereas, the Board instructed staff to review the GNSO recommendations and 
determine whether they were capable of implementation.

Whereas, staff has engaged international technical, operational and legal 
expertise to provide counsel on details to support the implementation of the 
Policy recommendations and as a result, ICANN cross-functional teams have 
developed implementation details in support of the GNSO's policy 
recommendations, and have concluded that the recommendations are capable of 
implementation.

Whereas, staff has provided regular updates to the community and the Board on 
the implementation plan. <http://icann.org/topics/new-gtld-program.htm>

Whereas, consultation with the DNS technical community has led to the 
conclusion that there is not currently any evidence to support establishing a 
limit to how many TLDs can be inserted in the root based on technical stability 
concerns. <http://www.icann.org/topics/dns-stability-draft-paper-06feb08.pdf>

Whereas, the Board recognizes that the process will need to be resilient to 
unforeseen circumstances.

Whereas, the Board has listened to the concerns about the recommendations that 
have been raised by the community, and will continue to take into account the 
advice of ICANN's supporting organizations and advisory committees in the 
implementation plan.

Resolved ( 2008.06.26.__ ), based on both the support of the community for New 
gTLDs and the advice of staff that the introduction of new gTLDs is capable of 
implementation, the Board adopts the GNSO policy recommendations for the 
introduction of new gTLDs 
<http://gnso.icann.org/issues/new-gtlds/pdp-dec05-fr-parta-08aug07.htm>.

Resolved ( 2008.06.26.__ ), the Board directs staff to continue to further 
develop and complete its detailed implementation plan, continue communication 
with the community on such work, and provide the Board with a final version of 
the implementation proposals for the board and community to approve before the 
new gTLD introduction process is launched.

IDNC / IDN Fast-track
Whereas, the ICANN Board recognizes that the "IDNC Working Group" developed, 
after extensive community comment, a final report on feasible methods for 
timely (fast-track) introduction of a limited number of IDN ccTLDs associated 
with ISO 3166-1 two-letter codes while an overall, long-term IDN ccTLD policy 
is under development by the ccNSO.

Whereas, the IDNC Working Group has concluded its work and has submitted 
recommendations for the selection and delegation of "fast-track" IDN ccTLDs 
and, pursuant to its charter, has taken into account and was guided by 
consideration of the requirements to:

Preserve the security and stability of the DNS;
Comply with the IDNA protocols;
Take input and advice from the technical community with respect to the 
implementation of IDNs; and
Build on and maintain the current practices for the delegation of ccTLDs, which 
include the current IANA practices.
Whereas, the IDNC Working Group's high-level recommendations require 
implementation planning.

Whereas, ICANN is looking closely at interaction with the final IDN ccTLD PDP 
process and potential risks, and intends to implement IDN ccTLDs using a 
procedure that will be resilient to unforeseen circumstances.

Whereas, staff will consider the full range of implementation issues related to 
the introduction of IDN ccTLDs associated with the ISO 3166-1 list, including 
means of promoting adherence to technical standards and mechanisms to cover the 
costs associated with IDN ccTLDs.

Whereas, the Board intends that the timing of the process for the introduction 
of IDN ccTLDs should be aligned with the process for the introduction of New 
gTLDs.

Resolved (2008.06.26.__), the Board thanks the members of the IDNC WG for 
completing their chartered tasks in a timely manner.

Resolved (2008.06.26.__), the Board directs staff to: (1) post the IDNC WG 
final report for public comments; (2) commence work on implementation issues in 
consultation with relevant stakeholders; and (3) submit a detailed 
implementation report including a list of any outstanding issues to the Board 
in advance of the ICANN Cairo meeting in November2008

GNSO Recommendation on Domain Tasting
Whereas, ICANN community stakeholders are increasingly concerned about domain 
tasting, which is the practice of using the add grace period (AGP) to register 
domain names in bulk in order to test their profitability.

Whereas, on 17 April 2008, the GNSO Council approved, by a Supermajority vote, 
a motion to prohibit any gTLD operator that has implemented an AGP from 
offering a refund for any domain name deleted during the AGP that exceeds 10% 
of its net new registrations in that month, or fifty domain names, whichever is 
greater. <http://gnso.icann.org/meetings/minutes-gnso-17apr08.shtml>

Whereas, on 25 April 2008, the GNSO Council forwarded its formal "Report to the 
ICANN Board - Recommendation for Domain Tasting" 
<http://gnso.icann.org/issues/domain-tasting/domain-tasting-board-report-gnso-council-25apr08.pdf>,
 which outlines the full text of the motion and the full context and procedural 
history of this proceeding.

Whereas, the Board is also considering the Proposed FY 09 Operating Plan and 
Budget <http://www.icann.org/financials/fiscal-30jun09.htm>, which includes (at 
the encouragement of the GNSO Council) a proposal similar to the GNSO policy 
recommendation to expand the applicability of the ICANN transaction fee in 
order to limit domain tasting.

Resolved (2008.06.26.__), the Board adopts the GNSO policy recommendation on 
domain tasting, and directs staff to implement the policy following appropriate 
comment and notice periods on the implementation documents.

Approval of Operating Plan and Budget for Fiscal Year 2008-2009
Whereas, ICANN approved an update to the Strategic Plan in December 2007. 
<http://www.icann.org/strategic-plan/>

Whereas, the Initial Operating Plan and Budget Framework for fiscal year 2009 
was presented at the New Delhi ICANN meeting and was posted in February 2008 
for community consultation. 
<http://www.icann.org/announcements/announcement-2-04feb08.htm>

Whereas, community consultations were held to discuss and obtain feedback on 
the Initial Framework.

Whereas, the draft FY09 Operating Plan and Budget was posted for public comment 
in accordance with the Bylaws on 17 May 2008 based upon the Initial Framework, 
community consultation, and consultations with the Board Finance Committee. A 
slightly revised version was posted on 23 May 2008. 
<http://www.icann.org/financials/fiscal-30jun09.htm>

Whereas, ICANN has actively solicited community feedback and consultation with 
ICANN's constituencies. <http://forum.icann.org/lists/op-budget-fy2009/>

Whereas, the ICANN Board Finance Committee has discussed, and guided staff on, 
the FY09 Operating Plan and Budget at each of its regularly scheduled monthly 
meetings.

Whereas, the final FY09 Operating Plan and Budget was posted on 26 June 2008. 
<http://www.icann.org/en/financials/proposed-opplan-budget-v3-fy09-25jun08-en.pdf>

Whereas, the ICANN Board Finance Committee met in Paris on 22 June 2008 to 
discuss the FY09 Operating Plan and Budget, and recommended that the Board 
adopt the FY09 Operating Plan and Budget.

Whereas, the President has advised that the FY09 Operating Plan and Budget 
reflects the work of staff and community to identify the plan of activities, 
the expected revenue, and resources necessary to be spent in fiscal year ending 
30 June 2009.

Whereas, continuing consultation on the budget has been conducted at ICANN's 
meeting in Paris, at constituency meetings, and during the public forum.

Resolved (2008.06.26.___), the Board adopts the Fiscal Year 2008-2009 Operating 
Plan and Budget. 
<http://www.icann.org/en/financials/proposed-opplan-budget-v3-fy09-25jun08-en.pdf>

Update on Draft Amendments to the Registrar Accreditation Agreement
(For discussion only.)

Approval of PIR Request to Implement DNSSEC in .ORG
Whereas, Public Interest Registry has submitted a proposal to implement DNS 
Security Extensions (DNSSEC) in .ORG. 
<http://icann.org/registries/rsep/pir-request-03apr08.pdf>

Whereas, staff has evaluated the .ORG DNSSEC proposal as a new registry service 
via the Registry Services Evaluation Policy 
<http://icann.org/registries/rsep/>, and the proposal included a requested 
amendment to Section 3.1(c)(i) of the .ORG Registry Agreement 
<http://icann.org/tlds/agreements/org/proposed-org-amendment-23apr08.pdf> which 
was posted for public comment along with the PIR proposal.

Whereas, the evaluation under the threshold test of the Registry Services 
Evaluation Policy <http://icann.org/registries/rsep/rsep.html> found a 
likelihood of security and stability issues associated with the proposed 
implementation. The RSTEP Review Team considered the proposal and found that 
there was a risk of a meaningful adverse effect on security and stability, 
which could be effectively mitigated by policies, decisions and actions to 
which PIR has expressly committed in its proposal or could be reasonably 
required to commit. 
<http://icann.org/registries/rsep/rstep-report-pir-dnssec-04jun08.pdf>

Whereas, the Chair of the SSAC has advised that RSTEP's thorough investigation 
of every issue that has been raised concerning the security and stability 
effects of DNSSEC deployment concludes that effective measures to deal with all 
of them can be taken by PIR, and that this conclusion after exhaustive review 
greatly increases the confidence with which DNSSEC deployment in .ORG can be 
undertaken.

Whereas, PIR intends to implement DNSSEC only after extended testing and 
consultation.

Resolved (2008.06.26.__), that PIR's proposal to implement DNSSEC in .ORG is 
approved, with the understanding that PIR will continue to cooperate and 
consult with ICANN on details of the implementation. The President and the 
General Counsel are authorized to enter the associated amendment to the .ORG 
Registry Agreement, and to take other actions as appropriate to enable the 
deployment of DNSSEC in .ORG.

ICANN Board of Directors' Code of Conduct
Whereas, the members of ICANN's Board of Directors are committed to maintaining 
a high standard of ethical conduct.

Whereas, the Board Governance Committee has developed a Code of Conduct to 
provide the Board with guiding principles for conducting themselves in an 
ethical manner.

Resolved (2008.06.26.__), the Board directs staff to post the newly proposed 
ICANN Board of Directors' Code of Conduct for public comment, for consideration 
by the Board as soon as feasible. [Reference to PDF will be inserted when 
posted.]

Ratification of Selection of Consultant to Conduct Independent Review of the 
Board
Whereas, the Board Governance Committee has recommended that Boston Consulting 
Group be selected as the consultant to perform the independent review of the 
ICANN Board.

Whereas, the BGC's recommendation to retain BCG was approved by the Executive 
Committee during its meeting on 12 June 2008.

Resolved (2008.06.26.__), the Board ratifies the Executive Committee's approval 
of the Board Governance Committee's recommendation to select Boston Consulting 
Group as the consultant to perform the independent review of the ICANN Board.

Appointment of Independent Review Working Groups
Whereas, the Board Governance Committee has recommended that several working 
groups should be formed to coordinate pending independent reviews of ICANN 
structures.

Resolved (2008.06.26.__), the Board establishes the following independent 
review working groups:

ICANN Board Independent Review Working Group: Amadeu Abril i Abril, Roberto 
Gaetano (Chair), Steve Goldstein, Thomas Narten, Rajasekhar Ramaraj, Rita 
Rodin, and Jean Jacques Subrenat.
DNS Root Server System Advisory Committee (RSSAC) Independent Review Working 
Group: Harald Alvestrand (Chair), Steve Crocker and Bruce Tonkin.
Security and Stability Advisory Committee (SSAC) Independent Review Working 
Group: Robert Blokzijl, Dennis Jennings (Chair), Reinhard Scholl and Suzanne 
Woolf.

Update on Independent Reviews of ICANN Structures
(For discussion only.)

Board Committee Assignment Revisions
Whereas, the Board Governance Committee has recommended that the membership of 
several Board should be revised, and that all other committees should remain 
unchanged until the 2008 Annual Meeting.

Resolved (2008.06.26.__), the membership of the Audit, Finance, and 
Reconsideration committees are revised as follows:

Audit Committee: Raimundo Beca, Demi Getschko, Dennis Jennings, Njeri Rionge 
and Rita Rodin (Chair).
Finance Committee: Raimundo Beca, Peter Dengate Thrush, Steve Goldstein, Dennis 
Jennings, Rajasekhar Ramaraj (Chair), and Bruce Tonkin (as observer).
Reconsideration Committee: Susan Crawford (Chair), Demi Getschko, Dennis 
Jennings, Rita Rodin, and Jean-Jacques Subrenat.


Approval of BGC Recommendations on GNSO Improvements
Whereas, Article IV, Section 4 of ICANN's Bylaws calls for periodic reviews of 
the performance and operation of ICANN's structures by an entity or entities 
independent of the organization under review.

Whereas, the Board created the "Board Governance Committee GNSO Review Working 
Group" (Working Group) to consider the independent review of the GNSO and other 
relevant input, and recommend to the Board Governance Committee a comprehensive 
proposal to improve the effectiveness of the GNSO, including its policy 
activities, structure, operations and communications.

Whereas, the Working Group engaged in extensive public consultation and 
discussions, considered all input, and developed a final report < 
http://www.icann.org/topics/gnso-improvements/gnso-improvements-report-03feb08.pdf
 > containing a comprehensive and exhaustive list of proposed recommendations 
on GNSO improvements.

Whereas, the Board Governance Committee determined that the GNSO Improvements 
working group had fulfilled its charter and forwarded the final report to the 
Board for consideration.

Whereas, a public comment forum was held open for 60 days to receive, consider 
and summarize < 
http://forum.icann.org/lists/gnso-improvements-report-2008/msg00033.html > 
public comments on the final report.

Whereas, the GNSO Council and Staff have worked diligently over the past few 
months to develop a top-level plan for approaching the implementation of the 
improvement recommendations, as requested by the Board at its New Delhi meeting.

Whereas, ICANN has a continuing need for a strong structure for developing 
policies that reflect to the extent possible a consensus of all stakeholders in 
the community including ICANN's contracted parties.

Resolved (2008.06.26.__), the Board endorses the recommendations of the Board 
Governance Committee's GNSO Review Working Group, other than on GNSO Council 
restructuring, and requests that the GNSO convene a small working group on 
Council restructuring including one representative from the current NomCom 
appointees, one member from each constituency and one member from each 
liaison-appointing advisory committee (if that advisory committee so desires), 
and that this group should reach consensus and submit a consensus 
recommendation on Council restructuring by no later than 25 July 2008 for 
consideration by

Receipt of Report of President's Strategy Committee Consultation
Whereas, the Chairman of the Board requested that the President's Strategy 
Committee undertake a process on how to strengthen and complete the ICANN 
multi-stakeholder model.

Whereas, the PSC has developed three papers that outline key areas and possible 
responses to address them: "Transition Action Plan," "Improving Institutional 
Confidence in ICANN," and "FAQ." < 
http://icann.org/en/announcements/announcement-16jun08-en.htm >

Whereas, these documents and the proposals contained in them have been 
discussed at ICANN's meeting in Paris.

Whereas, a dedicated webpage has been launched to provide the community with 
information, including regular updates < http://icann.org/jpa/iic/ >.

Resolved (2008.06.26.__), the Board thanks the President's Strategy Committee 
for its work to date, and instructs ICANN staff to undertake the public 
consultation recommended in the action plan, and strongly encourages the entire 
ICANN community to participate in the continuing consultations on the future of 
ICANN by reviewing and submitting comments to the PSC by 31 July 2008.

Selection of Mexico City for March 2009 ICANN Meeting

Whereas, ICANN intends to hold its first meeting for calendar year 2009 in the 
Latin America region;

Whereas, the Mexican Internet Association (AMIPCI) has agreed to host the 
meeting;

Resolved (2008.06.26.__), the Board accepts the AMIPCI proposal to host ICANN's 
34th global meeting in Mexico City, in March 2009.

Review of Paris Meeting Structure
(For discussion only.)

Board Response to Discussions Arising from Paris Meeting
(For discussion only.)

ICANN At-Large Summit Proposal
Whereas, at the ICANN meeting in New Delhi in February 2008, the Board resolved 
to direct staff to work with the ALAC to finalise a proposal to fund an ICANN 
At-Large Summit, for consideration as part of the 2008-2009 operating plan and 
budget process. < http://www.icann.org/minutes/resolutions-15feb08.htm >

Whereas, potential funding for such a summit has been identified in the FY09 
budget. < http://www.icann.org/financials/fiscal-30jun09.htm >

Whereas, a proposal for the Summit was completed and submitted shortly before 
the ICANN Meeting in Paris.

Resolved (2008.06.26.__), the Board approves the proposal to hold an ICANN 
At-Large Summit as a one-time special event, and requests that the ALAC work 
with ICANN Staff to implement the Summit in a manner that achieves efficiency, 
including considering the Mexico meeting as the venue.

Resolved (2008.06.26.__), with the maturation of At-Large and the proposal for 
the At-Large Summit's objectives set out, the Board expects the ALAC to look to 
more self-funding for At-Large travel in the fiscal year 2010 plan, consistent 
with the travel policies of other constituencies.



Glen de Saint Géry
GNSO Secretariat
gnso.secretariat@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://gnso.icann.org