[ga] Fw: [ PRIVACY Forum ] Priorities Amuck: ICANN Poised to Trigger Naming Quagmire

["Jeffrey A. Williams" <jwkckid1@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

All,

  I and our members fully agree with Laurens review here.  It's
clear that pending the GNSO review completion that some Constituency
groups, namely the IPC and the BC are interested in gaining influence
before users, the NCUC, and other thus far non represented groups
in the GNSO of ICANN gain influence in the decision making process
of ICANN.

  What worries me is as Lauren points out, that security concerns
for users of all types and at all levels will be facing increasing
attempted criminal scams, far more additional UCE/Spam ect., and that
LEA's will be facing a far greater challenge accordingly.  Perhaps this
is what ICANN intends vis a vi "dilution is the solution to polution"
attitude?


-----Forwarded Message-----
>From: privacy@xxxxxxxxxx
>Sent: Jun 25, 2008 10:01 AM
>To: privacy-list@xxxxxxxxxx
>Subject: [ PRIVACY Forum ] Priorities Amuck: ICANN Poised to Trigger Naming    
>Quagmire
>
>
>
>          Priorities Amuck: ICANN Poised to Trigger Naming Quagmire
>
>                http://lauren.vortex.com/archive/000393.html
>
>
>Greetings.  With all of the high-priority issues we face today
>regarding the Internet --like assuring network neutrality, or even
>getting decent Internet services to the 80% of the world's
>population that doesn't have them now -- it's distressing to see
>that ICANN is poised tomorrow to potentially trigger a confusing and
>likely highly litigious, wasteful, and disruptive land grab in new
>global top-level domain names (gTLDs) -- 
>( http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/technology/7468855.stm ).
>
>While ICANN's theoretical rationale for loosening up the domain name
>environment is not utterly without merit, the likely real world
>implications of a relative flood of new top-level domain names
>should be pretty obvious to even a casual observer of the Net over
>recent years.
>
>Everybody and his brother will want a top-level name.  ICANN will be
>deluged with applications.  Clever crooks will find ways to game the
>application and auction processes in league with shady registries.
>Name confusion and phishing will rise to new heights.  Full
>employment for lawyers is guaranteed, as trademark disputes -- and
>other legal disputes filed against ICANN's decisions regarding
>particular names, balloon to capture as much oxygen as possible.
>The dot-ex-ex-ex controversy and related censorship concerns
>associated with the horrible idea of a sex-centric TLD will rise yet
>again from the grave.
>
>And through it all, ICANN will be spinning its wheels with a
>complicated and expensive process while so many more important
>Internet issues are rotting essentially ignored on the sidelines
>( http://icann.org/topics/new-gtld-program.htm ).
>
>ICANN needs to get over their "domain names as issue #1" fetish once
>and for all.  Some minor relaxation of the gTLD structure is
>probably warranted, but not the waste of time, money, and other
>resources that their current plan seems sure to trigger -- and we
>could definitely live without the consumer confusion and risks that
>will arise from this mess as well.
>
>Enough is enough.  It's time for ICANN to get its priorities straight.
>
>--Lauren--
>Lauren Weinstein
>lauren@xxxxxxxxxx or lauren@xxxxxxxx 
>Tel: +1 (818) 225-2800
>http://www.pfir.org/lauren 
>Co-Founder, PFIR
>   - People For Internet Responsibility - http://www.pfir.org 
>Co-Founder, NNSquad 
>   - Network Neutrality Squad - http://www.nnsquad.org
>Founder, PRIVACY Forum - http://www.vortex.com 
>Member, ACM Committee on Computers and Public Policy
>Lauren's Blog: http://lauren.vortex.com 
>
>_______________________________________________
>privacy mailing list
>http://lists.vortex.com/mailman/listinfo/privacy

Regards,

Spokesman for INEGroup LLA. - (Over 281k members/stakeholders strong!)
"Obedience of the law is the greatest freedom" -
   Abraham Lincoln

"Credit should go with the performance of duty and not with what is
very often the accident of glory" - Theodore Roosevelt

"If the probability be called P; the injury, L; and the burden, B;
liability depends upon whether B is less than L multiplied by
P: i.e., whether B is less than PL."
United States v. Carroll Towing  (159 F.2d 169 [2d Cir. 1947]
===============================================================
Updated 1/26/04
CSO/DIR. Internet Network Eng. SR. Eng. Network data security IDNS.
div. of Information Network Eng.  INEG. INC.
ABA member in good standing member ID 01257402 E-Mail
jwkckid1@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
My Phone: 214-244-4827