ICANN/GNSO GNSO Email List Archives

[ga]


<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

Re: Re[2]: [ga] BBC article

  • To: Karl Peters - TLDA <tlda@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Subject: Re: Re[2]: [ga] BBC article
  • From: "Jeffrey A. Williams" <jwkckid1@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Tue, 24 Jun 2008 21:57:49 -0700 (GMT-07:00)

<HEAD><TITLE></TITLE>
<STYLE>body{font-family: 
Geneva,Arial,Helvetica,sans-serif;font-size:9pt;background-color: 
#ffffff;color: black;}</STYLE>

<META content="MSHTML 6.00.6000.16674" name=GENERATOR></HEAD>
<BODY id=compText>
<P>Karl and all,</P>
<P>&nbsp;</P>
<P>&nbsp; Well Karl, largely I for one am in agreement with you.&nbsp; But if 
you recall Leah had</P>
<P>a golden opertunity to file suit regarding .BIZ and declined to do so, even 
with </P>
<P>allot of pro bono legal support.</P>
<P>&nbsp;</P>
<P>&nbsp; Chris was really the one that got shafted worse the Leah, as .WEB at 
the time</P>
<P>would have been very competitive with .COM then.&nbsp; But now, I doubt that 
very many</P>
<P>new GTLD's will be very marketable given the number of choices already 
avaliable.</P>
<P>&nbsp;</P>
<P>&nbsp; </P>
<P>Finnally, making statements and remarks on the GA and not directly to</P>
<P>the ICANN bod and staff members as well as DOC/NTIA really doesn't</P>
<P>do any good.&nbsp; <BR><BR><BR></P>
<BLOCKQUOTE style="PADDING-LEFT: 5px; MARGIN-LEFT: 0px; BORDER-LEFT: #0000ff 
2px solid">-----Original Message----- <BR>From: Karl Peters - TLDA 
<TLDA@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx><BR>Sent: Jun 24, 2008 9:16 PM <BR>To: chris@xxxxxx 
<BR>Cc: *ICANN GA List <GA@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx><BR>Subject: Re[2]: [ga] BBC article 
<BR><BR><ZZZHTML><ZZZHEAD><ZZZMETA content="text/html; charset=iso-8859-1" 
http-equiv="Content-Type"><ZZZMETA content="text/css" 
http-equiv="Content-Style-Type">
<STYLE type=text/css><ZZZ!--
body {
  margin: 5px 5px 5px 5px;
  background-color: #ffffff;
}
/* ========== Text Styles ========== */
hr { color: #000000}
body, table /* Normal text */
{
 font-size: 10pt;
 font-family: 'Arial';
 font-style: normal;
 font-weight: normal;
 color: #000000;
 text-decoration: none;
}
span.rvts1 /* Heading */
{
 font-weight: bold;
 color: #0000ff;
}
span.rvts2 /* Subheading */
{
 font-weight: bold;
 color: #000080;
}
span.rvts3 /* Keywords */
{
 font-style: italic;
 color: #800000;
}
a.rvts4, span.rvts4 /* Jump 1 */
{
 color: #008000;
 text-decoration: underline;
}
a.rvts5, span.rvts5 /* Jump 2 */
{
 color: #008000;
 text-decoration: underline;
}
/* ========== Para Styles ========== */
p,ul,ol /* Paragraph Style */
{
 text-align: left;
 text-indent: 0px;
 padding: 0px 0px 0px 0px;
 margin: 0px 0px 0px 0px;
}
.rvps1 /* Centered */
{
 text-align: center;
}
--></STYLE>
</ZZZHEAD><ZZZBODY>
<P>Thanks, Chris,</P>
<P>&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;Your comments are well received with regard to 
the theft of .biz from a fully functional and profitable Atlantic Root&nbsp; 
Network (Leah Gallegos) by ICANN to sell to higher bidder in Australia. ICANN 
still seems to believe it is the only viable root system despite even other 
governments setting up their own quite successfully, not to mention the 
Inclusive Name-Space community with the ORSC, WorldRoot and the Cesidian Root 
just to name a few.</P>
<P>&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;After years of resisting the opening of the ICANN 
root to new TLDs, probably to insure profitability to the friends of ICANN who 
run the paid for and thus "accepted" ones, it appears they are now trying to 
quickly get in front of the wave of public sentiment and auction off what they 
never owned and now have ever less and less legitimate claim to control over, 
so as to get a last cash infusion before the whole TLD matter is more 
completely out of their hands and ICANN becomes irrelevant. </P>
<P>&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;If this is not the case, why an auction now and 
not several years ago? Why not accept .WEB with all Chris put into it? Why not 
go through the same process for awarding TLDs as before? (I didn't like them, 
but ICANN made more more that way than they will with an auction now!)</P>
<P>&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;As for the theft of currently operating and RFC 
compliant TLDs such as with .biz,, all I can say is "Remember the ,BIZ!!!</P>
<P><BR></P>
<P>-Karl E. Peters</P>
<P>&nbsp;</P>
<P>Regards,</P>
<P>Spokesman for INEGroup LLA. - (Over 281k members/stakeholders 
strong!)<BR>"Obedience of the law is the greatest freedom" -<BR>&nbsp;&nbsp; 
Abraham Lincoln</P>
<P>"Credit should go with the performance of duty and not with what is<BR>very 
often the accident of glory" - Theodore Roosevelt</P>
<P>"If the probability be called P; the injury, L; and the burden, 
B;<BR>liability depends upon whether B is less than L multiplied by<BR>P: i.e., 
whether B is less than PL."<BR>United States v. Carroll Towing&nbsp; (159 F.2d 
169 [2d Cir. 
1947]<BR>===============================================================<BR>Updated
 1/26/04<BR>CSO/DIR. Internet Network Eng. SR. Eng. Network data security 
IDNS.<BR>div. of Information Network Eng.&nbsp; INEG. INC.<BR>ABA member in 
good standing member ID 01257402 E-Mail<BR><A 
href="mailto:jwkckid1@xxxxxxxxxxxxx";>jwkckid1@xxxxxxxxxxxxx</A><BR>My Phone: 
214-244-4827</P></ZZZBODY></ZZZHTML></BLOCKQUOTE></BODY>



<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>