RE: [ga] AGP Formal Resolution

["Dominik Filipp" <dominik.filipp@xxxxxxxx>]

Eric and all,
 
Ok, thank you. I will step forward for the organizing of domain tasting
related posts.
 
Some my proposals
 
1. At the beginning, I see your and the list monitors' role to justify
and approve the daily posting limit. I would propose to go over to 10
posts per day/person for issue-related posts while keeping the current 5
post limit for other posts; that is, 15 posts/person/day collectively.
Would it be ok?
 
2. Then I, as a moderator, would initially open 2 threads with subjects
 
GA_ISSUE-001: Domain Tasting | AGP - Registrars/Registries Concerns
GA_ISSUE-001: Domain Tasting | AGP - Additional Topics and Views
 
where
 
a) "GA_ISSUE-" an issue-related-post identifier; this can be used for
private post filtering and internal mail organization
b) "001" - the unique code of this first 'Domain Tasting' issue (1000 -
1 possible issues opened should be sufficient :-)
c) "Domain Tasting | AGP" - issue | category [| subcategory...] etc.
d) "- Registrars/Registries Concerns" - main thread topic
 
These threads should collect facts/views/opinions on the topics prior to
preparing the final resolution, which will be another 3. thread opened
later on.
 
Any ideas and/or wording corrections are appreciated.
 
Dominik
 
________________________________

From: owner-ga@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:owner-ga@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf
Of Hugh Dierker
Sent: Wednesday, April 16, 2008 8:25 PM
To: ga
Subject: Re: [ga] AGP Formal Resolution


I find nothing disagreeable here. If some one will step forward for the
organizing of the contributions that would be our next step. (I cannot
organize my socks into same color pairs so I am not the one) If no one
comes forth I will search out and find someone.
 
Thank you both for your contributions.
 
Eric

chris@xxxxxx wrote: 

        Dominik, just tell me what you want me to do. I'm all for option
3 without the extra chatter.
         
        Chris McElroy
         
         

                ----- Original Message ----- 
                From: Dominik Filipp <mailto:dominik.filipp@xxxxxxxx>  
                To: Hugh Dierker <mailto:hdierker2204@xxxxxxxxx>  
                Cc: ga@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx 
                Sent: Wednesday, April 16, 2008 5:38 AM
                Subject: RE: [ga] AGP Formal Resolution

                Eric and others,
                 
                The resolution should gain more support within the GA to
achieve al least a certain degree of credibility.
                 
                I've been taking the bull by the horns for a while but
this motion shouldn't be a one man's show but rather a result of a
comprehensible deliberation over the issue discussed here. It all has
started quite encouragingly with number of Chris's, Jeff's and Karl's
valuable contributions, just mentioning a few. But the people here have
apparently started feeling frustrated and the number of relevant posts
has decreased rapidly.
                 
                I understand that everyone is already fed up with all
that perpetual ignorance but I see three ways how to proceed further. We
can let things slide, or chatter about everything during coffee breaks,
or go into it. As for me, I am wavering between the first and the third
option. It depends on the overall support gained here on the GA. Maybe
some of us are feeling frustrated or a bit paralyzed but I think the
intellectual potential presented here is a good basis for
self-confidence. It is very likely that we were able to collect more
evidence than all other official bodies have done so far collectively.
In fact, only the registrars/registries were able to issue relevant
arguments worth considering and elaborating on. The rest is mostly just
a masquerade.
                There is also another dimension to consider; an attempt
to build up and test a real bottom-up process to find out whether this
is doable at all. But the decision is, of course, up to everyone.
                 
                Ok, stop chattering now. Eric, the formal resolution
will require some sort of minor management as well as some small
modifications to take into effect. It is likely that once the motion
gains more support the daily post limit will be found insufficient. Also
the resulting resolution will likely be seconded and eventually issued
as a pdf document, ok? I personally do not want to discuss too much over
the management details but rather get it running and to correcting it on
the fly.
                 
                I can moderate this issue on the GA. The first step
could be opening a thread on the issue. I would start with the five
registrars/registries concerns enumerated in the official domain tasting
report. Several posts sent here already address these concerns more in
detail so those can be further discussed or recollected.
                 
                Would it be acceptable?
                 
                Dominik
                
                
________________________________

                From: Hugh Dierker [mailto:hdierker2204@xxxxxxxxx] 
                Sent: Wednesday, April 16, 2008 12:23 AM
                To: Dominik Filipp; debbie@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
                Cc: ga@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
                Subject: Re: [ga] Formal resolution
                
                
                Dominik,
                 
                Absolutely. Somehow we should start with taking our
header string and actually narrowing it down further as there are some
relevant yet innapplicable posts there.
                The person - selfulfilling, most interested in the
matter should take the bull by the horns.
                I of course will be here to assist as will many other GA
members. 
                We will be heard if a credible resolution is passed.
                 
                Eric
                
                
                

                        
                        Eric,
                        
                        What about to prepare the more formal GA
resolution regarding the AGP
                        you have proposed?
                        We could start collecting relevant points
regarding this.
                        
                        Dominik
                        
                        ________________________________
                        
                        > From: owner-ga@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:owner-ga@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On
                        Behalf Of Hugh Dierker
                        > Sent: Monday, March 31, 2008 8:18 PM
                        > To: debbie@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx;
ga@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
                        > Subject: Re: [ga] List Rules
                        
                        > ...
                        
                        > We are at a point for the first time in
months,
                        > that the list is coalescing into the form of
                        > producing a statement/motion. The AGP issue
                        > seems to have come to a head and more formal
                        > resolution procedures may be appropriate.
                        > I believe it is at a motion stage with 4
seconds.
                        > If the desire is to move forward in a
constructive
                        > effective matter, we should hear that from the
members.
                        
                        > Eric


________________________________

Be a better friend, newshound, and know-it-all with Yahoo! Mobile. Try
it now.
<http://us.rd.yahoo.com/evt=51733/*http://mobile.yahoo.com/;_ylt=Ahu06i6
2sR8HDtDypao8Wcj9tAcJ>