Re: [ga] IPv6 faces trial by fire tonight

[David Scott <tlda@xxxxxxxxxx>]

One would have to speculate that moving root to root transfers over an 
IPv6 may have high advantages.
Although, maybe they are still trying to keep the control of things very 
close to their hearts.
Is it really a good idea to develop on your live stuff?

David Scott
UCANN2

Jeffrey A. Williams wrote:
> All,
>
> In regards to transitioning from IPv4 to IPv6 a "Trial by fire"
> for some if not most users will start this evening.  Our members
> whom are protected from outage via NAT's, will not largely be
> negatively impacted.  Other, and likely most users will experience
> outage or loss of connectivity to the Internet unless their service
> provider hasn't implemented to IPv6.
>
>   I have to wonder if and why DOC authorized this test...
>
> See:
>  
> http://www.networkworld.com/news/2008/031208-ipv6-ietf.html?netht=ts_031208&nladname=031208dailynewspmal
>
> Regards,
>
> Spokesman for INEGroup LLA. - (Over 277k members/stakeholders strong!)
> "Obedience of the law is the greatest freedom" -
>    Abraham Lincoln
>
> "Credit should go with the performance of duty and not with what is
> very often the accident of glory" - Theodore Roosevelt
>
> "If the probability be called P; the injury, L; and the burden, B;
> liability depends upon whether B is less than L multiplied by
> P: i.e., whether B is less than PL."
> United States v. Carroll Towing  (159 F.2d 169 [2d Cir. 1947]
> ===============================================================
> Updated 1/26/04
> CSO/DIR. Internet Network Eng. SR. Eng. Network data security IDNS.
> div. of Information Network Eng.  INEG. INC.
> ABA member in good standing member ID 01257402 E-Mail
> jwkckid1@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> My Phone: 214-244-4827
>
>
>
>