<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
[ga] Re: [At-Large] Registrars exploit the lack of ICANN contract enforcement
- To: John Levine <johnl@xxxxxxxx>
- Subject: [ga] Re: [At-Large] Registrars exploit the lack of ICANN contract enforcement
- From: Danny Younger <dannyyounger@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 29 Feb 2008 09:39:22 -0800 (PST)
Re: a) What process does ICANN have to audit registrar
compliance with the RAA?
ICANN plans to "increase" site visits to assess RAA
compliance -- they will now visit up to 100 sites --
golly that's almost ten percent of the registrar
community, so perhaps in a decade we will finally have
full compliance. See page 22 of the current operating
plan at
http://www.icann.org/planning/ops-budget-framework-09.pdf
b) Once egregious violations of the RAA is brought
to ICANN's attention, what process does ICANN have to
correct them?
Currently ICANN puts out a "Notice of Intent to Issue
Advisory", accepts public comments, and then does
nothing. -- see
http://www.icann.org/announcements/announcement-19sep07.htm
as an example of current practices.
____________________________________________________________________________________
Never miss a thing. Make Yahoo your home page.
http://www.yahoo.com/r/hs
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|