<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
Re: [ga] RE: ICANN Board Recommends Action on Domain Tasting
- To: ga@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Subject: Re: [ga] RE: ICANN Board Recommends Action on Domain Tasting
- From: "Jeffrey A. Williams" <jwkckid1@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 13 Feb 2008 02:30:38 -0800
Chuck and all,
You seem to miss the point, or refuse to recognize same. Again
"Design Teams" are a circumvention technique in this sort of
issue and clearly represent as such, a clear violation of the MOU.
Open and transparent direct participation is what is required
and/or necessary.
Design Teams would only be appropriate for addressing a technical
redo of registration software in which Domain name Tasting can
be identified and eliminated, but not in addressing wheather such
is needed to eliminate same.
Regards,
Spokesman for INEGroup LLA. - (Over 277k members/stakeholders strong!)
"Obedience of the law is the greatest freedom" -
Abraham Lincoln
"Credit should go with the performance of duty and not with what is
very often the accident of glory" - Theodore Roosevelt
"If the probability be called P; the injury, L; and the burden, B;
liability depends upon whether B is less than L multiplied by
P: i.e., whether B is less than PL."
United States v. Carroll Towing (159 F.2d 169 [2d Cir. 1947]
===============================================================
Updated 1/26/04
CSO/DIR. Internet Network Eng. SR. Eng. Network data security IDNS.
div. of Information Network Eng. INEG. INC.
ABA member in good standing member ID 01257402 E-Mail
jwkckid1@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
My Phone: 214-244-4827
"Gomes, Chuck" wrote:
> Danny,
>
> Note that I referred to the design teams I was involved in; I was not
> involved in the DT design team. I suggest you either read the
> transcript or listen to the MP3 of the Council meeting today to see/hear
> the comments I made. I think you will find that my comments are in line
> with your concerns.
>
> Chuck
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Danny Younger [mailto:dannyyounger@xxxxxxxxx]
> Sent: Tuesday, February 12, 2008 10:31 PM
> To: Gomes, Chuck
> Cc: ga@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: RE: [ga] RE: ICANN Board Recommends Action on Domain Tasting
>
> Chuck,
>
> The recommendations that this design team has come up with don't really
> seem to accord with the public input provided during the public comment
> period. It does not reflect the views of CADNA or INTA or those of
> Dominick and others that have called for elimination of the AGP.
>
> Perhaps you can point me to a place in the record that indicates that
> the design team reviewed, analyzed and considered the public comments
> tendered. Sorry, but I can't find a reference. Where is the record of
> the debate on the relative merits of eliminating the AGP?
>
> I think we're all getting more than a little bit tired of Council
> members repeatedly ignoring the public input.
>
> regards,
> Danny
>
> --- "Gomes, Chuck" <cgomes@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> > Danny,
> >
> > Why do you assume that design teams lock out other contributors? All
> > the design teams or drafting teams I have been involved with have been
>
> > open to non-council participants. Moreover, in no case were the
> > design teams making any final decisions but rather only doing some
> > initial drafting work to facilitate full Council and thus full
> > community deliberation.
> >
> > Chuck Gomes
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: owner-ga@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > [mailto:owner-ga@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Danny Younger
> > Sent: Tuesday, February 12, 2008 12:18 PM
> > To: Dominik Filipp
> > Cc: ga@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > Subject: Re: [ga] RE: ICANN Board Recommends Action on Domain Tasting
> >
> >
> > Dominik,
> >
> > Have a look at this:
> >
> http://gnso.icann.org/mailing-lists/archives/council/msg04643.html
> >
> > Without commenting on the recommendations tendered, I am more than
> > somewhat concerned that the use of a "Design Team"
> > approach is
> > circumventing the expected PDP and serves to lock out other
> > contributors from the process.
> >
> > regards,
> > Danny
> >
> >
> >
> >
> ________________________________________________________________________
> > ____________
> > Looking for last minute shopping deals?
> > Find them fast with Yahoo! Search.
> >
> http://tools.search.yahoo.com/newsearch/category.php?category=shopping
> >
>
>
> ________________________________________________________________________
> ____________
> Looking for last minute shopping deals?
> Find them fast with Yahoo! Search.
> http://tools.search.yahoo.com/newsearch/category.php?category=shopping
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|