Re: [ga] RE: ICANN Board Recommends Action on Domain Tasting

["Jeffrey A. Williams" <jwkckid1@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Danny and all,

  Again right Danny!  But do you really expect an honest
definitive answer?  I don't, nor do any of our members.
Ignoring public views or recognizing consensus, measured
or not, has proven over and over again to be a stalwart
of ICANN and especially the GNSO.  In fact in the
"Design Team" circumvention apporach, even taking in
stakeholders views, suggestions, or any other sort of
imput is nearly eliminated.  That's a clear violation of
the MOU IMHO...

  The shell game of ICANN sadly continues...

Regards,

Spokesman for INEGroup LLA. - (Over 277k members/stakeholders strong!)
"Obedience of the law is the greatest freedom" -
   Abraham Lincoln

"Credit should go with the performance of duty and not with what is
very often the accident of glory" - Theodore Roosevelt

"If the probability be called P; the injury, L; and the burden, B;
liability depends upon whether B is less than L multiplied by
P: i.e., whether B is less than PL."
United States v. Carroll Towing  (159 F.2d 169 [2d Cir. 1947]
===============================================================
Updated 1/26/04
CSO/DIR. Internet Network Eng. SR. Eng. Network data security IDNS.
div. of Information Network Eng.  INEG. INC.
ABA member in good standing member ID 01257402 E-Mail
jwkckid1@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
My Phone: 214-244-4827

Danny Younger wrote:

> Chuck,
>
> The recommendations that this design team has come up
> with don't really seem to accord with the public input
> provided during the public comment period.  It does
> not reflect the views of CADNA or INTA or those of
> Dominick and others that have called for elimination
> of the AGP.
>
> Perhaps you can point me to a place in the record that
> indicates that the design team reviewed, analyzed and
> considered the public comments tendered.  Sorry, but I
> can't find a reference.  Where is the record of the
> debate on the relative merits of eliminating the AGP?
>
> I think we're all getting more than a little bit tired
> of Council members repeatedly ignoring the public
> input.
>
> regards,
> Danny
>
> --- "Gomes, Chuck" <cgomes@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> > Danny,
> >
> > Why do you assume that design teams lock out other
> > contributors?  All
> > the design teams or drafting teams I have been
> > involved with have been
> > open to non-council participants.  Moreover, in no
> > case were the design
> > teams making any final decisions but rather only
> > doing some initial
> > drafting work to facilitate full Council and thus
> > full community
> > deliberation.
> >
> > Chuck Gomes
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: owner-ga@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > [mailto:owner-ga@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf
> > Of Danny Younger
> > Sent: Tuesday, February 12, 2008 12:18 PM
> > To: Dominik Filipp
> > Cc: ga@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > Subject: Re: [ga] RE: ICANN Board Recommends Action
> > on Domain Tasting
> >
> >
> > Dominik,
> >
> > Have a look at this:
> >
> http://gnso.icann.org/mailing-lists/archives/council/msg04643.html
> >
> > Without commenting on the recommendations tendered,
> > I am more than
> > somewhat concerned that the use of a "Design Team"
> > approach is
> > circumventing the expected PDP and serves to lock
> > out other contributors
> > from the process.
> >
> > regards,
> > Danny
> >
> >
> >
> >
> ________________________________________________________________________
> > ____________
> > Looking for last minute shopping deals?
> > Find them fast with Yahoo! Search.
> >
> http://tools.search.yahoo.com/newsearch/category.php?category=shopping
> >
>
>       
> ____________________________________________________________________________________
> Looking for last minute shopping deals?
> Find them fast with Yahoo! Search.  
> http://tools.search.yahoo.com/newsearch/category.php?category=shopping