Re: [ga] RE: ICANN Board Recommends Action on Domain Tasting

["Jeffrey A. Williams" <jwkckid1@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Danny and all,

  Yes.  But the question which may be more relevant, is why
the obvious ruse than and Dominick elaborates upon?  Shell
game perhaps?  Secondly clearly the Bod decision will not,
has not, and cannot have significant effect on curtailing and
does not halt Tasting for reasons already stated, and evidence
already provided.  Yet means by which halting Domain name
Tasting/Front running were articulated, and made known to the
ICANN Board.  Therefore I and I have to believe the knowledgeable
stakeholder/registrant or future registrant can only reasonably
conclude that ICANN nor the GNSO had any real intent to
halt Domain name Tasting/Front running, only sought to seek a
method by which ICANN could benefit financially of such errant
activity.  That seems to me, and our members to be a direct
and intentful act of restraint of trade.  DOC/NTIA should require
the ICANN board to reconsider immediately!

Regards,

Spokesman for INEGroup LLA. - (Over 277k members/stakeholders strong!)
"Obedience of the law is the greatest freedom" -
   Abraham Lincoln

"Credit should go with the performance of duty and not with what is
very often the accident of glory" - Theodore Roosevelt

"If the probability be called P; the injury, L; and the burden, B;
liability depends upon whether B is less than L multiplied by
P: i.e., whether B is less than PL."
United States v. Carroll Towing  (159 F.2d 169 [2d Cir. 1947]
===============================================================
Updated 1/26/04
CSO/DIR. Internet Network Eng. SR. Eng. Network data security IDNS.
div. of Information Network Eng.  INEG. INC.
ABA member in good standing member ID 01257402 E-Mail
jwkckid1@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
My Phone: 214-244-4827

Danny Younger wrote:

> Dominick,
>
> For what it's worth, last year the ALAC sent through a
> comment to the public forum on the 2007 Budget (it was
> the only comment received) that recommended the
> application of part or all of the registrar-level
> transaction fee to domains deleted during the AGP.
>
> See
> http://forum.icann.org/lists/budget-0708/msg00001.html
>
> There is nothing, however, to indicate that the board
> ever read, discussed, or considered this advice from
> the ALAC... there was certainly no board-to-ALAC
> discussion of this recommendation.
>
>       
> ____________________________________________________________________________________
> Never miss a thing.  Make Yahoo your home page.
> http://www.yahoo.com/r/hs