Jeff's vacation (was Re: [ga] Lesbians at ICANN)

[George Kirikos <gkirikos@xxxxxxxxx>]

Hello,

--- "Jeffrey A. Williams" <jwkckid1@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> by such content unless of course it was not accurate.  I would have
> my
> sensibilities
> "irrevocability damaged" if complete archives of any ICANN comments,
> blogs or
> web pages were not fully and completely archived without exception or
> edit.  To do
> such a thing is not excusable and would be against US law and would
> warrent
> reporting to LEA officials accordingly.  Ergo Kieren, some of your

Are you still on this list, "Jeff"? I'm surprised you had not earned
another "vacation" given that you posted 6 messages in a 24 hour period
recently:

1. http://gnso.icann.org/mailing-lists/archives/ga-200709/msg00938.html
(Sat, 19 Jan 2008 21:23:11 -0800)

2. http://gnso.icann.org/mailing-lists/archives/ga-200709/msg00937.html
(Sat, 19 Jan 2008 21:02:35 -0800)

3. http://gnso.icann.org/mailing-lists/archives/ga-200709/msg00936.html
(Sat, 19 Jan 2008 20:49:34 -0800)

4. http://gnso.icann.org/mailing-lists/archives/ga-200709/msg00935.html
(Sat, 19 Jan 2008 17:30:45 -0800)

5. http://gnso.icann.org/mailing-lists/archives/ga-200709/msg00933.html
(Sat, 19 Jan 2008 15:50:34 -0800)

6. http://gnso.icann.org/mailing-lists/archives/ga-200709/msg00932.html
(Sat, 19 Jan 2008 15:14:46 -0800)

That's above the limit, as you know.

Anyhow, it's not ICANN's mission to be a permanent archive for obvious
porn spam.

Sincerely,

George Kirikos
http://www.kirikos.com/