ICANN/GNSO GNSO Email List Archives

[ga]


<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

Re: [ga] Proposed Advisory

  • Subject: Re: [ga] Proposed Advisory
  • From: Ross Rader <ross@xxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Tue, 4 Dec 2007 12:48:20 -0500



On 4-Dec-07, at 12:38 PM, Nevett, Jonathon wrote:

I don't disagree that there can be an enforcement track and a policy
track. Unfortunately, ICANN staff's draft advisory is attempting to go down the road of amending the terms of the Transfer Policy on the issue
of whether registrars may lock domain names for a period of time or
require special provisions when a registrant changes Whois contact
information just before a transfer request - often a precursor to domain name hijacking. Such policy work falls within the GNSO's mandate and is
well beyond the ICANN staff's authority.  If you don't like a certain
business practice, you should seek a solution under the approved policy
process. The draft Advisory attempts to deny registrars a key tool in
protecting registrants from fraud by changing policy outside the
approved policy development process.

This is not only inaccurate, but also FUD. ICANN is tasked with enforcing its contracts. This policy is a part of that contract. ICANN has issued an advisory (draft form or otherwise) outlining how they are choosing to interpret that contract. And frankly, not only is it consistent with the wording and intent of the original transfers task force, but also of most everyone out there, save Network Solutions and GoDaddy.

We went through this circus with NSI on transfers the first time, specifically because we didn't like your business practice. I don't mind it if you choose not to abide by your contracts, but please don't try to tell me that this isn't a contractual issue between NSI and ICANN - at least not with a straight face.

It's very easy to use words like "flagrant" and "clear" without any
supporting facts


No, the fact that we regularly have to reach out to registrars like NSI on a personal basis and beg for a favor to have a name unlocked so that a customer can transfer a name away from you makes it easy to use words like "flagrant" and 'clear". Happy to provide as many specific examples as you can stomach.

Ross Rader
Director, Retail Services
t. 416.538.5492
c. 416.828.8783
http://www.domaindirect.com

"To solve the problems of today, we must focus on tomorrow."
- Erik Nupponen







<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>