ICANN/GNSO GNSO Email List Archives

[ga]


<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

Re: [ga] .et wildcarded

  • To: JFC Morfin <jefsey@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Danny Younger <dannyyounger@xxxxxxxxx>, Bashar Al-Abdulhadi <bashar@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "ga@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx >> GA" <ga@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Subject: Re: [ga] .et wildcarded
  • From: jwkckid1@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • Date: Sun, 18 Nov 2007 20:23:07 -0600 (GMT-06:00)

Jefsey and all,

  ICANN-GA-Investigations.org anyone?

-----Original Message-----
>From: JFC Morfin <jefsey@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>Sent: Nov 18, 2007 1:17 PM
>To: Danny Younger <dannyyounger@xxxxxxxxx>, Bashar Al-Abdulhadi 
><bashar@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "ga@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx >> GA" <ga@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>Subject: Re: [ga] .et wildcarded
>
>
>This means that comments, reporting requests etc. are interference in 
>sovereign national management. This is explicitely prohibited by GAC 
>and WSIS which prohibit the influence of a foreign country in the 
>management of a national zone. As an US Citizen, Member of the US 
>Civil Society, Danny Younger is fully legitimate in criticizing, 
>intefering, hacking, etc. the ".us" zone. He is at least discourteous 
>in negatively discussing any other national zone. This is something 
>we all tend to forget and which is very negatively appreciated by 
>national ccTLDs. This unfortunate attitude of us is certainly the 
>main reason why the ccNSO includes a limited set of ccTLDs.  May be 
>could we take advantage from this to investigate all the cases, 
>documents, situations, etc. where ICANN and ICANN Community Members 
>interfere with sovereign name spaces.
>
>Actually, I think it could be a good occasion to investigate a job 
>that could fall onto the GA's mandate. To create specialised 
>investigation committees to report on ICANN wrongdoings or possible 
>better doing. This would mean that remarks as the one Danny is 
>talented could result from a group of persons having commonly 
>investigated the issue (possibly with a dedicated site) and reported it.
>jfc
>
>
>
>At 16:42 18/11/2007, Danny Younger wrote:
>
>
>>Hi Bashar,
>>
>>While there is no "rule", there is an IAB proposed
>>guideline:
>>
>>"If you want to use wildcards in your zone and
>>understand the risks, go ahead, but only do so with
>>the informed consent of the entities that are
>>delegated within your zone."
>>
>>Full IAB commentary at
>>http://www.iab.org/documents/docs/2003-09-20-dns-wildcards.html
>>
>>regards,
>>Danny
>>
>>
>>--- Bashar Al-Abdulhadi <bashar@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>
>> > Danny,
>> > Is there any rule that prohibit ccTLD operators from
>> > running wildcard on
>> > their zones?
Regards,

Jeffrey A. Williams
Spokesman for INEGroup LLA. - (Over 277k members/stakeholders strong!)
"Obedience of the law is the greatest freedom" -
   Abraham Lincoln

"Credit should go with the performance of duty and not with what is very
often the accident of glory" - Theodore Roosevelt

"If the probability be called P; the injury, L; and the burden, B; liability
depends upon whether B is less than L multiplied by
P: i.e., whether B is less than PL."
United States v. Carroll Towing  (159 F.2d 169 [2d Cir. 1947]
===============================================================
Updated 1/26/04
CSO/DIR. Internet Network Eng. SR. Eng. Network data security IDNS. div. of
Information Network Eng.  INEG. INC.
ABA member in good standing member ID 01257402 E-Mail jwkckid1@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Phone: 214-244-4827





<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>