Re: [ga] Suspension for one month

["Prophet Partners Inc." <Domains@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Hi Joe,

Given that these are two separate violations, a strong argument could be 
made in favor of Eric's decision for a 4-week suspension.
Sincerely,
Ted
http://www.ProphetPartners.com
http://www.Premium-Domain-Names.com


----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Joe Baptista" <baptista@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
To: "Hugh Dierker" <hdierker2204@xxxxxxxxx>
Cc: "Jeff Williams" <jwkckid1@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>; "GA" <ga@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Monday, September 03, 2007 11:40 PM
Subject: Re: [ga] Suspension for one month


> I support the suspension based on two complaints received to date from:
>
> Hugh Dierker on 25/08/2007 in which complaint said that Mr. Williams
> "recent postings as being disruptive. In particular posting falsities
> with the specific intent that they disrupt ongoing activity on this list."
>
> Danny Younger on 02/09/2007 complained that Mr. Williams "posted to the
> GA list on eight occasions within a 24 hour period on September 1 in
> violation of the GA rules."  This was confirmed.
>
> I however would recommend that the suspension be for a period of two
> weeks.  This is in accordance with the list rules in which first
> offensers are suspended for two weeks.  Which see section 4 at URL:
>
> http://www.geolang.com/draftGAListRules5.htm
>
> Kindest regards
> Joe Baptista
>
> Hugh Dierker wrote:
>
> > As List Monitor and Chair I hereby suspend the posting privileges of
> > Jeff Williams for a period of one month. This decision is not taken
> > lightly. It is not taken on a single post. It is not taken on a single
> > violation of grounds or provisions.
> >
> > The action is taken on the totality of this posters posts over the
> > last month. Clear grounds include but are not limited to posting
> > limits violations, threats of legal action, disruptive posting, direct
> > insults and a clear intent to discourage other participants from
> > exercising their rights to post, in a peaceful fashion. I am also
> > mindful of a stated intent to continue this disruptive posting.
> > Activity and sanctions on other ICANN lists were also noted.
> >
> > The worst and yet perhaps not technically a violation is the constant
> > placing of the GA, the GNSO and ICANN and their members in disrepute
> > and a bad light, with absolutely no discernible benefit to anyone.
> >
> > The appeal time begins now and any and all appeals should be addressed
> > to me personally and not the GA list. You may appeal as much as you
> > please but the Chair will only entertain three emails on the subject.
> > All of such correspondence shall be understood to be available for
> > public viewing, it will not be private.
> --
> Joe Baptista                                www.publicroot.org
> PublicRoot Consortium
> ----------------------------------------------------------------
> The future of the Internet is Open, Transparent, Inclusive,
> Representative & Accountable to the Internet community @large.
> ----------------------------------------------------------------
>  Office: +1 (202) 517-1593
>     Fax: +1 (509) 479-0084