ICANN/GNSO GNSO Email List Archives


<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

Re: [dow3tf] Draft of Revised Preliminary Report

  • To: <wellings@xxxxxxxx>, <dow3tf@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Subject: Re: [dow3tf] Draft of Revised Preliminary Report
  • From: "Brian Darville" <BDARVILLE@xxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Wed, 07 Jul 2004 11:41:50 -0400
  • Sender: owner-dow3tf@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx


Please make sure that the summary of comments is a separate appendix to the report.  Also, please prepare a redline version so that we can all see the changes to the report that you are proposing in the revised draft.

Thank you.

Brian Darville

>>> Frannie Wellings <wellings@xxxxxxxx> 07/07/04 11:29AM >>>
Actually, I've been working diligently according to the original 
plan. So by the end of the day, I will have a revision of the report 
incorporating the summary of comments I've prepared.  I didn't 
anticipate a change of plans. Look forward to talking to you all soon 
and working towards consensus in this task force, Frannie

At 09:51 AM -0400 07.07.2004, Brian Darville wrote:
>I think it would make sense for you and Frannie to prepare a summary 
>of the comments which we can then include as an additional appendix 
>to the Final Report.  Please put that summary in final form so that 
>we will not need to edit it.  If possible, please circulate the 
>summary by the end of the day today.
>I will take the summary and then try to update the report, although 
>I don't anticipate that each comment would materially change the 
>>>>  "Ross Wm. Rader" <ross@xxxxxxxxxx> 07/07/04 09:39AM >>>
>Brian Darville wrote:
>>  Frannie had indicated that she would work with Ross in providing a 
>>revised preliminary report incorporating the public comments 
>>provided through July 5, 2004.  Frannie said she would circulate 
>>that revised report for comment by the end of the day today.  After 
>>receiving the revised report the Task Force members should each 
>>promptly provide comments concerning the report so that we can 
>>incorporate those comments by Friday, July 9, 2004 so that the 
>>report can be submitted on Monday, July 12, 2004.
>What criteria should we use to include comments in the report? It was
>actually my impression that Frannie and I were going to prepare a
>summary of the relevant comments made in the various submissions but
>that we wouldn't actually be touching the report itself. Will you and
>Barbara be crafting the final report based on these comments or has this
>somehow fallen to Frannie and I now?
>My preference is to complete our preparation of the summary of the
>comments and not to do any work on the report itself.
>Clarification would be helpful as it currently isn't clear what is
>expected from us nor are there any good precedents to fall back on.
>                         -rwr
>                  "Every contrivance of man, every tool, every instrument,
>                   every utensil, every article designed for use, of each
>                   and every kind, evolved from very simple beginnings."
>                          - Robert Collier
>Got Blog? http://www.blogware.com 
>My Blogware: http://www.byte.org 



Frannie Wellings
Policy Fellow, Electronic Privacy Information Center   ~    http://www.epic.org 
Director, The Public Voice    ~   http://www.thepublicvoice.org 

1718 Connecticut Ave. N.W., Suite 200 
Washington, D.C.  20009  


+1 202 483 1140 x 107 (telephone)
+1 202 483 1248 (fax)


<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>