ICANN/GNSO GNSO Email List Archives


<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

Re: [dow2tf] Another 1.4 change/local law

  • To: KathrynKL@xxxxxxx
  • Subject: Re: [dow2tf] Another 1.4 change/local law
  • From: Thomas Keller <tom@xxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Thu, 27 May 2004 09:55:42 +0200
  • Cc: Jordyn@xxxxxxxxxxxxx, dow2tf@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • In-reply-to: <19769826.09005618.0254A67C@aol.com>
  • Organization: Schlund + Partner AG
  • References: <19769826.09005618.0254A67C@aol.com>
  • Sender: owner-dow2tf@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • User-agent: Mutt/

no more words needed. As I already stated in my last mail I would like
to go back to Jordyns version regarding Section 1.4 as well.



Am 26.05.2004 schrieb KathrynKL@xxxxxxx:
> I would also like to see Section 1.4 return to the original restatement of 3.3 recommendations regarding local law (from Jordyn's version w/o Steve's 5/26 changes).  Jordyn's version combines the elements of compliance, notification, and process within ICANN.  Let's leave the details to 3.3 for people to read about the two different processes: one to notify ICANN after compliance with law enforcement orders, and two to consult with ICANN prior to responding to law enforcement. 
> Steve's version states only the 2nd and not the first.  That's not really fair.  I say let's leave the detail to the 3.3 text.   thanks, kathy

<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>