ICANN/GNSO GNSO Email List Archives

[dow2tf]


<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

Re: [dow2tf] Whois tf 2: Draft section 2.4

  • To: KathrynKL@xxxxxxx
  • Subject: Re: [dow2tf] Whois tf 2: Draft section 2.4
  • From: Thomas Roessler <roessler@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Sun, 23 May 2004 20:25:21 +0200
  • Cc: metalitz@xxxxxxxx, gnso.secretariat@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx, dow2tf@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • In-reply-to: <1e0.21426643.2de109d9@aol.com>
  • Mail-followup-to: KathrynKL@xxxxxxx, metalitz@xxxxxxxx, gnso.secretariat@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx, dow2tf@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • References: <1e0.21426643.2de109d9@aol.com>
  • Sender: owner-dow2tf@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • User-agent: Mutt/1.5.6i

On 2004-05-22 15:54:01 -0400, Kathryn Kleiman wrote:

> Steve: thanks for the revisions.  As for the introduction
> paragraphs, at the risk of a collective TF2 groan, I think we
> should definitely include the substance of the arguments raised
> regarding collection of this data.  You mentioned that we could
> include two one-sided views.  It is my hope that we can reach 
> one fairly neutral overview of the comments, as we have done in
> the other sections.

This approach sounds reasonable.  One of the useful roles a
"findings" section can play is to summarize and compare the various
positions received from constituencies in one place.

-- 
Thomas Roessler  <roessler@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
At-Large Advisory Committee: http://alac.info/



<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>