<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
Re: [dow2tf] Whois tf 2: Draft section 2.4
- To: KathrynKL@xxxxxxx
- Subject: Re: [dow2tf] Whois tf 2: Draft section 2.4
- From: Thomas Roessler <roessler@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sun, 23 May 2004 20:25:21 +0200
- Cc: metalitz@xxxxxxxx, gnso.secretariat@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx, dow2tf@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- In-reply-to: <1e0.21426643.2de109d9@aol.com>
- Mail-followup-to: KathrynKL@xxxxxxx, metalitz@xxxxxxxx, gnso.secretariat@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx, dow2tf@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- References: <1e0.21426643.2de109d9@aol.com>
- Sender: owner-dow2tf@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- User-agent: Mutt/1.5.6i
On 2004-05-22 15:54:01 -0400, Kathryn Kleiman wrote:
> Steve: thanks for the revisions. As for the introduction
> paragraphs, at the risk of a collective TF2 groan, I think we
> should definitely include the substance of the arguments raised
> regarding collection of this data. You mentioned that we could
> include two one-sided views. It is my hope that we can reach
> one fairly neutral overview of the comments, as we have done in
> the other sections.
This approach sounds reasonable. One of the useful roles a
"findings" section can play is to summarize and compare the various
positions received from constituencies in one place.
--
Thomas Roessler <roessler@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
At-Large Advisory Committee: http://alac.info/
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|