Re: [dow2tf] Topics to discuss

[Thomas Keller <tom@xxxxxxxxxx>]

Very well the specific recommendations I would like to talk about
on todays call are:

ICANN WHOIS policy and local laws:

	Policy Proposal:

	No Registrar should be forced to breach its local laws regarding
	the collection, display and distribution of personal data in order
	to be able to provide ICANN approved domain registrations, regardless
	of whether the WHOIS service is provided by such registrar or
	another party under agreement with such registrar.

Tiered Access 

	Policy Proposal:

	As outlined in the Registrar statement.

Best,

tom

Am 26.04.2004 schrieb Jordyn A. Buchanan:
> Hi all: 
> 
> Keep in mind that our goal on today's call is to discuss specific 
> policy recommendations. 
> 
> To that end, it will be hard for us to grapple with topics like "ICANN 
> WHOIS regulation and local/laws regulations" or even "Data element 
> publication".  I'm sure that each of these topics has the potential to 
> yield some specific policy recommendations, and I'd like to encourage 
> Tom or Kathy (or whoever else) to try to make some specific 
> recommendations with regards to these topics.  (Similar to what Tom's 
> done with regards to tiered access or Steve has done on his 
> suggestions.) 
> 
> Jordyn 
> 
> On Apr 23, 2004, at 1:00 PM, KathrynKL@xxxxxxx wrote: 
> 
> 
> > All, sorry to miss all the fun yesterday.  I have come to see the 
> > wisdom of what David wrote.  As much as I would like to debate the 
> > purposes of WHOIS (which I raised) and see value in Tim's concerns, 
> > I think we must move forward to the work of the TF.  The "purpose 
> > of WHOIS" was an issue raised late in the game, after the close of 
> > data gathering, by George Papapavlou in Rome.  Reluctantly, I agree 
> > that it is a bit outside our scope and certainly outside our time 
> > frame right now. 
> > 
> >  For Monday's call, I support the two topics of discussion Tom 
> > Keller has put forth:  "1.) Icann whois regulation and local 
> > laws/regulations  2.) Tiered access model (Registrars/ALAC)"  (I am 
> > not sure I agree, or even fully understand, the questions raised by 
> > Marilyn, so I would like to start with the questions as raised by 
> > Tom (the big picture) and then work together to define the 
> > details). 
> > 
> >  I would like add a number 3.) Data Element Publication 
> > (Registry/NCUC/ALAC) 
> >  Regards, Kathy 
> > 
> >  David Maher wrote:  
> > 
> > 
> >  <<We don't need to get into a discussion of the purposes of WHOIS. 
> > My  
> >  constituency (registries) has its own view of the purposes and 
> > other  
> >  constituencies have their own views. We can still work on the 
> > assigned  
> >  purposes of this TF from a basis of disagreement on the ultimate 
> > purposes  
> >  of WHOIS.>> 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> 
> 

Gruss,

tom

(__)        
(OO)_____  
(oo)    /|\	A cow is not entirely full of
  | |--/ | *    milk some of it is hamburger!
  w w w  w