Re: [dow1tf] Paragraphs and footnotes

["David Fares" <dfares@xxxxxxxxx>]

After thinking about it, I agree that we should avoid 
footnotes, but rather identify where there are differences 
of views in the body of the recommendations, identifying 
the constituencies that agree with the different 
viewpoints.

Thanks,
David



Subject:        	[dow1tf] Paragraphs and footnotes
Date sent:      	Wed, 26 May 2004 17:28:58 +0100
From:           	"Jeremy Banks" <Jeremy.Banks@xxxxxxxx>
To:             	<dow1tf@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, <Jeff.Neuman@xxxxxxxxxx>

> 
> Jeff
> 
> Regarding the format of the report, I have concerns regarding the use
> of paragraphs and footnotes to highlight the different positions
> within TF1 especially where there is an even split on opinion.  I feel
> that it would be much clearer, and removes any obvious
> preferences/ambiguities, to have the positions of the TF members
> included in the main body of the document. Once voting has taken place
> on each of the recommendations, the results can be recorded against
> the relevant position.
> 
> Regards
> 
> Jeremy

David A. Fares
Director, Electronic Commerce
U.S. Council for International Business
dfares@xxxxxxxxx
Tel: 212-703-5061
     212-354-4480
Fax: 212-575-0327