[dow1tf] RE: Paragraphs and footnotes

["Neuman, Jeff" <Jeff.Neuman@xxxxxxxxxx>]

I appreciate your concerns, and we can clarify on the mailing lists, but I
believe each of the positions that are contained within the footnotes are
comments made by one or more constituencies, but are not in the "majority
opinion" at this point in time.  With respect to the White List, since it is
pretty much an even split, that disagreement will be reflected in the main
body.  If you believe any of the comments in the report are misleading
(i.e., implying a majority when none exists), then please let me know.

Does anyone else disagree?

Thanks.

Jeff

-----Original Message-----
From: Jeremy Banks [mailto:Jeremy.Banks@xxxxxxxx]
Sent: Wednesday, May 26, 2004 12:29 PM
To: dow1tf@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx; Jeff.Neuman@xxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Paragraphs and footnotes



Jeff

Regarding the format of the report, I have concerns regarding the use of
paragraphs and footnotes to highlight the different positions within TF1
especially where there is an even split on opinion.  I feel that it
would be much clearer, and removes any obvious preferences/ambiguities,
to have the positions of the TF members included in the main body of the
document. Once voting has taken place on each of the recommendations,
the results can be recorded against the relevant position.

Regards

Jeremy