<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
[dow1tf] Whois task force 1 notes minutes teleconference February 10
- To: "1DOW1tf" <dow1tf@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: [dow1tf] Whois task force 1 notes minutes teleconference February 10
- From: "GNSO SECRETARIAT" <gnso.secretariat@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 17 Feb 2004 21:26:45 +0100
- Importance: Normal
- Reply-to: <gnso.secretariat@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Sender: owner-dow1tf@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Please find the notes/minutes of the Whois task force 1 teleconference held
on February 10, 2004.
If you would like any changes made, please let me know.
Thank you.
Glen de Saint Géry
GNSO Secretariat
<!--#set var="bartitle" value="WHOIS Task Force 1 minutes"-->
<!--#set var="pagetitle" value="WHOIS Task Force 1 minutes"-->
<!--#set var="10 February 2004" value=""-->
<!--#set var="bgcell" value="#ffffff"-->
<!--#include virtual="/header.shtml"-->
<!--#exec cmd="/usr/bin/perl /etc/gnso/menu.pl 'WHOIS Task Force 1 minutes'"-->
<p align="center"><font face="Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif"><b>WHOIS Task Force
1 Teleconference February 10 , 2004 - Minutes</b></font></p>
<p><b><font face="Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif">ATTENDEES:<br>
</font></b></p>
<p><b><font face="Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif">GNSO Constituency representatives:<br>
</font></b><font face="Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif">gTLD Registries constituency:
- Jeff</font><b><font face="Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif"> </font></b><font face="Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif">Neuman</font><b><font face="Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif">
- </font></b><font face="Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif">Chair</font><b><font face="Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif"><br>
</font></b><font face="Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif">Commercial and Business
Users constituency - David Fares <br>
</font><font face="Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif">gTLD Registries constituency
</font><b><font face="Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif">- </font></b><font face="Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif">David
Maher<br>
</font><font face="Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif">Intellectual Property Interests
Constituency - Jeremy Banks<br>
Non Commercial Users Constituency - Milton Mueller </font> <font face="Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif"><br>
</font><font face="Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif"><br>
<b>Liaisons:</b><br>
At-Large Advisory Committee (ALAC) liaisons - Wendy Seltzer<br>
<b>ICANN Staff Manager</b>: Barbara Roseman<br>
<b>GNSO Secretariat:</b> Glen de Saint Géry <br>
<br>
<b>Absent:</b></font><br>
<font face="Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif">Internet Service and Connectivity
Providers constituency: - Antonio Harris</font> - <font face="Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif">apologies</font><font face="Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif"><br>
Registrars constituency - Paul Stahura</font></p>
<p><font face="Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif"><b>Surveys</b></font></p>
<p><font face="Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif">Glen de Saint Géry reported
the <a href="http://gnso.icann.org/issues/whois-privacy/questionnaire-tf1-06feb04.shtml">task
force 1 survey questionnaire</a> had been distributed to the address list that
<b>Barbara Roseman</b> had provided <br>
and a list of <a href="http://gnso.icann.org/mailing-lists/archives/dow1tf/msg00072.html">company
names without addresses</a> were sent to the task force members to identify
possible contacts and distribute the survey.<br>
In addition the survey was distributed to the GNSO constituency list, and published
on the <a href="http://gnso.icann.org/issues/whois-privacy/">ICANN website</a>.<br>
Some task force members sent snail mail address contacts and it was suggested
that Barbara Roseman ask the ICANN office to send the survey to them.<br>
<br>
In summary:<br>
</font><font face="Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif">1) Surveys <br>
a) Each member will send out the survey to its own constituency to try to get
the constituencies to circulate them to other entities and organizations. <br>
b) ICANN will look into putting a notice on its website about the survey.<br>
c) Glen will look into fixing typo in last sentence of the questionnaire (the
word "our" is in there twice). <br>
d) We will circulate the list of organizations to the group and divide up the
contacts so that we can follow up with them personally to ensure that they are
filling out the survey. <br>
</font><font face="Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif"> </font><font face="Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif">e)
It was suggested that the survey response archives be sent to each task force
member.<br>
<br>
<b>Needs and Justification chart</b><br>
<b>Jeff Neuman</b> referred to Wendy Seltzer's <a href="http://gnso.icann.org/mailing-lists/archives/dow1tf/msg00071.html">email</a>,
reporting on the first sub group meeting to prepare a chart listing: WHOIS data
user (individual or group); Stated needs for WHOIS data; and Justification for
those uses of WHOIS data, from pervious Whois workshop material and suggesting
individual work assignments.<br>
<b>David Maher</b> reported completing his assignment of presentations which
were statements about privacy and did not go into detail. A list of data was
not possible, there should be a textural explanation in the columns. Wendy remarked
that the presentations indicated that people did not want the data made public,
rather than a concern why the data was needed.<br>
<b>Milton Mueller </b>stated that trying to visualize the end result of the
task force, it was difficult to understand the purpose of the latest exercise
collecting the needs and justifications.<br>
There seem to be 2 interests at stake:<br>
- </font><font face="Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif">People who used various forms
of data, such as port 43 <br>
- Others, such as the registries and registrars or the service providers who
find or think that the Whois capabilities are abused.<br>
He was rather of the opinion that additional data should perhaps be collected
about the registrars and registries load in terms of what it means to them and
whether there was a big problem.<br>
<br>
<b>Jeff Neuman</b> restated the task force's role according to the terms of
reference:<br>
1. - collect the stated needs and the justification for those needs from non-marketing
users of contact information (this could be extracted from the Montreal workshop
and also by GNSO constituencies, and should also include accessibility requirements
(e.g based on W3C standards) <br>
2. - review general approaches to prevent automated electronic data mining and
ensure that the requirements for access are met (including accessibility requirements
for those that may for example be visually impaired) <br>
3. - determine whether any changes are required in the contracts to allow the
approaches to be used above (for example the contracts require the use of the
port-43 WHOIS protocol and this may not support approaches to prevent data mining)
<br>
<br>
<b>David Fares</b> commented that point 2 was a factual review while point 3
called for the revision of contracts allowing everything identified in 2 to
be implemented, but in fact, it was noted, there was no place to make a policy
recommendation whether any of those should be implemented. <br>
</font></p>
<p><font face="Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif">Collection of facts and constituency
statements was considered important but would not provide much guidance to the
Council. Should be included in the chart in third column. The</font><font face="Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif">
task force goal was to report to the Council what the needs and justification
were for different types of data, whether through port 43 or web based access
and to see if there were ways to restrict the access.<br>
<b>Milton Mueller</b> emphasized the need for the task force to make recommendations</font><font face="Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif">.<br>
Clarification was needed on the terms of reference as to policy recommendations.
For example, the Terms of Reference do not ask the Task Force to make recommendations
as to whether they believed access should be restricted and if so, how. If they
were not charged with making such recommendations, then who would be? <br>
<br>
<b>In summary:</b><br>
2) Needs/Justification Charts: <br>
a) First draft of charts due to Jeff Neuman by Thursday, Feb. 12th. who will
collate them into one chart and send out to group by the weekend.<br>
b)Review chart on the next call. <br>
c) Please remember to include a third column on the chart for concerns about
access to Whois. <br>
<br>
Following a concern raised by Milton Mueller on Registry/Registrar Methods for
Restricting Access, it was agreed that Milton Mueller, Paul Stahura and Jeffe
Neuman would work on a second questionnaire to go to the Registries and Registrars
on the issues involved with access to Whois (i.e., what the load is on our system,
costs, etc.) and what mechanisms they have used (or are out there) to restrict
access.<br>
<br>
b) Discuss draft at next meeting with goal of getting it out next week, 17 February.<br>
<br>
<b>General Comment </b><br>
a) Guidance was required from the GNSO Council on timelines. <br>
</font></p>
<p><font face="Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif"><b>Jeff Neuman thanked everyone for
their presence and participation and ended the call at 16:50 UTC.<br>
<br>
</b> <b>Next call: Tuesday 17 February 2004, </b> <b>16:00 UTC, 11:00 EST, 8:00
Los Angeles, 17:00 CET.<br>
<br>
<br>
</b></font></p>
<p> </p>
<p> </p>
<p> </p>
<p> </p>
<p> </p>
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|