RE: [dow1-2tf] WHOIS and proxy services and other items for work by TF
- To: "'Neuman, Jeff'" <Jeff.Neuman@xxxxxxxxxx>, "'Thomas Roessler'" <roessler@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "'Cade,Marilyn S - LGCRP'" <mcade@xxxxxxx>
- Subject: RE: [dow1-2tf] WHOIS and proxy services and other items for work by TF
- From: "Tim Ruiz" <tim@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 5 Oct 2004 08:53:32 -0500
- Cc: <dow1-2tf@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Importance: Normal
- In-reply-to: <7927C67249E4AD43BC05B539AF0D12980101F3A6@stntexch04.cis.neustar.com>
- Sender: owner-dow1-2tf@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Sorry to pipe in here again. Maybe I missed it, but from what I've seen of
the discussion on conflict with national laws, it hasn't seemed to address
If a legitimate conflict exists, any forbearance should not preclude a
registrant's ability to transfer their names because their new registrar of
choice cannot get current contact info with which to confirm the request.
You all might consider addressing that specifically in any policy proposal,
if you haven't already.
From: owner-dow1-2tf@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:owner-dow1-2tf@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx]
On Behalf Of Neuman, Jeff
Sent: Tuesday, October 05, 2004 8:37 AM
To: 'Thomas Roessler'; Cade,Marilyn S - LGCRP
Subject: RE: [dow1-2tf] WHOIS and proxy services and other items for work by
Today's discussion will focus on tiered access with a brief recap of the
discussions last week. The tiered access discussion today will focus on
feasibility and will most likely also focus on identifying the appropriate
experts. Towards the end of the call, we will also need to discuss future
scheduling and closing the loops on the previous action items involving the
conspicuous notice issues as well as the conflict with national law issues.
From: Thomas Roessler [mailto:roessler@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx]
Sent: Tuesday, October 05, 2004 7:01 AM
To: Cade,Marilyn S - LGCRP
Subject: Re: [dow1-2tf] WHOIS and proxy services and other items for
work by TF
On 2004-10-05 06:53:00 -0400, Marilyn Cade wrote:
> I think the TF was going to discuss recommending experts, and how
> to agree on identifying a balanced set of experts? That would be
> a productive initiative that might get started today.
The agreed upon agenda for today is to start discussion of tiered
access; see the minutes from the September 14 call.
Thomas Roessler . Personal soap box at <http://log.does-not-exist.org/>.