<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
Re: [dow1-2tf] RE: WSJ story re Whois and proxy services
- To: "Cade,Marilyn S - LGCRP" <mcade@xxxxxxx>
- Subject: Re: [dow1-2tf] RE: WSJ story re Whois and proxy services
- From: Thomas Roessler <roessler@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 1 Oct 2004 14:58:57 +0200
- Cc: Marc Schneiders <marc@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "Steven J. Metalitz IIPA" <metalitz@xxxxxxxx>, dow1-2tf@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- In-reply-to: <0F25F91B59355E42846E57527F331EA904148F21@lganj0se6.lga.att.com>
- Mail-followup-to: "Cade,Marilyn S - LGCRP" <mcade@xxxxxxx>, Marc Schneiders <marc@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "Steven J. Metalitz IIPA" <metalitz@xxxxxxxx>, dow1-2tf@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- References: <0F25F91B59355E42846E57527F331EA904148F21@lganj0se6.lga.att.com>
- Sender: owner-dow1-2tf@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- User-agent: Mutt/1.5.6i
On 2004-10-01 07:47:32 -0400, Marilyn Cade wrote:
> As to anonymous services, why are we not intersted in learning
> more about them to see what the satisfaction is with these
> services?
We do have specific policy proposals on tiered access to discuss.
If we trust the WSJ's numbers, that's an issue that affects the
privacy of about 95% of new registrations (and their registrants).
That should take priority over looking at services that are only
used by 5% of registrants, without any particular policy proposals
on the table. Don't you think?
--
Thomas Roessler · Personal soap box at <http://log.does-not-exist.org/>.
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|